Israel vs Norway: Tools (PO)

Israel
100
in 2018
Norway
100
in 2018
Israel rank
21st
Norway rank
21st

Tools (PO) over time

  • Israel
  • Norway
020406080100200720122018

How they compare

Israel currently reports 100 against 100 in Norway, a difference of 0.

Across all 12 years both countries report, Norway has been ahead every year.

Israel ranks 21st and Norway ranks 21st of 47 countries.

Head to head by decade

Decade Israel Norway Difference Ahead
2000s 100 100 0
2010s 100 100 0

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher tools (po), Israel or Norway?
Israel, at 100 against 100 in Norway as of 2018.
What is the difference in tools (po) between Israel and Norway?
0, with Israel ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Israel and Norway?
12 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2018.
How do Israel and Norway rank globally for tools (po)?
Israel ranks 21st and Norway ranks 21st of 47 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Monetary Fund, published as Tools (PO) (Index). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Israel vs Norway: Tools (PO). Statizoid, drawing on International Monetary Fund. Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/tools-po-index/israel/norway/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/tools-po-index/israel/norway/">Israel vs Norway: Tools (PO)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Tools (PO) (Index)
Source
International Monetary Fund
Licence
IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
48 places, 546 data points, 2007–2018
Last refreshed

Monetary policy framework comprises the structures in place that enable and guide the conduct of monetary policy. In this project, we provide a multidimensional characterization of monetary policy frameworks across three pillars: Independence and Accountability, Policy and Operational Strategy, and Communications (IAPOC). This database covers 50 advanced economies, emerging markets, and low-income developing countries, from 2007 to 2018 (being extended).