Kenya vs Serbia: Tools (PO)

Kenya
100
in 2018
Serbia
100
in 2018
Kenya rank
21st
Serbia rank
21st

Tools (PO) over time

  • Kenya
  • Serbia
0255075100125200720122018

How they compare

Kenya currently reports 100 against 100 in Serbia, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 9 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Serbia ahead.

Kenya ranks 21st and Serbia ranks 21st of 47 countries.

Serbia has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher tools (po), Kenya or Serbia?
Kenya, at 100 against 100 in Serbia as of 2018.
What is the difference in tools (po) between Kenya and Serbia?
0, with Kenya ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Kenya and Serbia?
9 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2018.
How do Kenya and Serbia rank globally for tools (po)?
Kenya ranks 21st and Serbia ranks 21st of 47 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Monetary Fund, published as Tools (PO) (Index). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Kenya vs Serbia: Tools (PO). Statizoid, drawing on International Monetary Fund. Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/tools-po-index/kenya/serbia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/tools-po-index/kenya/serbia/">Kenya vs Serbia: Tools (PO)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Tools (PO) (Index)
Source
International Monetary Fund
Licence
IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
48 places, 546 data points, 2007–2018
Last refreshed

Monetary policy framework comprises the structures in place that enable and guide the conduct of monetary policy. In this project, we provide a multidimensional characterization of monetary policy frameworks across three pillars: Independence and Accountability, Policy and Operational Strategy, and Communications (IAPOC). This database covers 50 advanced economies, emerging markets, and low-income developing countries, from 2007 to 2018 (being extended).