Aruba vs Naoero: Total assets, Adjusted using IMF accounting records (Assets)

Aruba
22.26 million US dollar per square kilometre
in 2023
Naoero
24.09 million US dollar per square kilometre
in 2023
Aruba rank
23rd
Naoero rank
21st

Total assets, Adjusted using IMF accounting records (Assets) over time

  • Aruba
  • Naoero
5.0M10.0M15.0M20.0M25.0M199820102023

How they compare

Naoero currently reports 24.09 million US dollar per square kilometre against 22.26 million US dollar per square kilometre in Aruba, a difference of 1.83 million US dollar per square kilometre.

That makes Naoero's figure about 1.1 times Aruba's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 16 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Aruba ahead.

Aruba ranks 23rd and Naoero ranks 21st of 169 countries.

Aruba has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Aruba Naoero Difference Ahead
2000s 13.54 million US dollar per square kilometre 4.74 million US dollar per square kilometre 8.81 million US dollar per square kilometre Aruba
2010s 15.16 million US dollar per square kilometre 7.52 million US dollar per square kilometre 7.64 million US dollar per square kilometre Aruba
2020s 21.70 million US dollar per square kilometre 21.22 million US dollar per square kilometre 479,600 US dollar per square kilometre Aruba

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher total assets, adjusted using imf accounting records (assets), Aruba or Naoero?
Naoero, at 24.09 million US dollar per square kilometre against 22.26 million US dollar per square kilometre in Aruba as of 2023.
What is the difference in total assets, adjusted using imf accounting records (assets) between Aruba and Naoero?
1.83 million US dollar per square kilometre, with Naoero ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Aruba and Naoero?
16 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2023.
How do Aruba and Naoero rank globally for total assets, adjusted using imf accounting records (assets)?
Aruba ranks 23rd and Naoero ranks 21st of 169 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Total assets, Adjusted using IMF accounting records (Assets, Positions, US dollar), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Aruba vs Naoero: Total assets, Adjusted using IMF accounting records (Assets). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 31 August 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/total-assets-adjusted-using-imf-accounting-records-assets-positions-us-dollar-per-square/aruba/naoero/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/total-assets-adjusted-using-imf-accounting-records-assets-positions-us-dollar-per-square/aruba/naoero/">Aruba vs Naoero: Total assets, Adjusted using IMF accounting records (Assets)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Total assets, Adjusted using IMF accounting records (Assets, Positions, US dollar), per square kilometre
Unit
US dollar per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
169 places, 4,007 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Total assets, Adjusted using IMF accounting records (Assets, Positions, US dollar) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.