How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Morocco?

22 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Total assets, Adjusted using IMF accounting records (Assets, Positions, US dollar), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Brazil vs Morocco: Total assets, Adjusted using IMF accounting records (Assets)

Brazil

117,945 US dollar per square kilometre

in 2023

Morocco

131,048 US dollar per square kilometre

in 2023

Brazil rank

119th

Morocco rank

117th

Total assets, Adjusted using IMF accounting records (Assets) over time

Brazil
Morocco

How they compare

Morocco currently reports 131,048 US dollar per square kilometre against 117,945 US dollar per square kilometre in Brazil, a difference of 13,103 US dollar per square kilometre.

That makes Morocco's figure about 1.1 times Brazil's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 22 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Morocco ahead.

Brazil ranks 119th and Morocco ranks 117th of 169 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Brazil averaged higher in 1 and Morocco in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Brazil	Morocco	Difference	Ahead
2000s	32,003 US dollar per square kilometre	53,908 US dollar per square kilometre	21,905 US dollar per square kilometre	Morocco
2010s	93,751 US dollar per square kilometre	75,127 US dollar per square kilometre	18,624 US dollar per square kilometre	Brazil
2020s	114,040 US dollar per square kilometre	122,246 US dollar per square kilometre	8,207 US dollar per square kilometre	Morocco

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher total assets, adjusted using imf accounting records (assets), Brazil or Morocco?: Morocco, at 131,048 US dollar per square kilometre against 117,945 US dollar per square kilometre in Brazil as of 2023.
What is the difference in total assets, adjusted using imf accounting records (assets) between Brazil and Morocco?: 13,103 US dollar per square kilometre, with Morocco ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Morocco?: 22 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2023.
How do Brazil and Morocco rank globally for total assets, adjusted using imf accounting records (assets)?: Brazil ranks 119th and Morocco ranks 117th of 169 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Total assets, Adjusted using IMF accounting records (Assets, Positions, US dollar), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Brazil vs Morocco: Total assets, Adjusted using IMF accounting records (Assets). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 31 August 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/total-assets-adjusted-using-imf-accounting-records-assets-positions-us-dollar-per-square/brazil/morocco/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/total-assets-adjusted-using-imf-accounting-records-assets-positions-us-dollar-per-square/brazil/morocco/">Brazil vs Morocco: Total assets, Adjusted using IMF accounting records (Assets)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Total assets, Adjusted using IMF accounting records (Assets, Positions, US dollar), per square kilometre
Unit: US dollar per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 169 places, 4,007 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed: 31 August 2026

Total assets, Adjusted using IMF accounting records (Assets, Positions, US dollar) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.