How many years of comparable data are there for Cape Verde and Jordan?

20 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Total assets, Adjusted using IMF accounting records (Assets, Positions, US dollar), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Cape Verde vs Jordan: Total assets, Adjusted using IMF accounting records (Assets)

Cape Verde

441,409 US dollar per square kilometre

in 2023

Jordan

447,218 US dollar per square kilometre

in 2023

Cape Verde rank

83rd

Jordan rank

82nd

Total assets, Adjusted using IMF accounting records (Assets) over time

Cape Verde
Jordan

How they compare

Jordan currently reports 447,218 US dollar per square kilometre against 441,409 US dollar per square kilometre in Cape Verde, a difference of 5,809 US dollar per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 20 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Jordan ahead.

Cape Verde ranks 83rd and Jordan ranks 82nd of 169 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Cape Verde averaged higher in 1 and Jordan in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Cape Verde	Jordan	Difference	Ahead
2000s	154,652 US dollar per square kilometre	196,977 US dollar per square kilometre	42,325 US dollar per square kilometre	Jordan
2010s	281,465 US dollar per square kilometre	279,522 US dollar per square kilometre	1,943 US dollar per square kilometre	Cape Verde
2020s	401,124 US dollar per square kilometre	412,133 US dollar per square kilometre	11,009 US dollar per square kilometre	Jordan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher total assets, adjusted using imf accounting records (assets), Cape Verde or Jordan?: Jordan, at 447,218 US dollar per square kilometre against 441,409 US dollar per square kilometre in Cape Verde as of 2023.
What is the difference in total assets, adjusted using imf accounting records (assets) between Cape Verde and Jordan?: 5,809 US dollar per square kilometre, with Jordan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cape Verde and Jordan?: 20 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2023.
How do Cape Verde and Jordan rank globally for total assets, adjusted using imf accounting records (assets)?: Cape Verde ranks 83rd and Jordan ranks 82nd of 169 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Total assets, Adjusted using IMF accounting records (Assets, Positions, US dollar), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cape Verde vs Jordan: Total assets, Adjusted using IMF accounting records (Assets). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 31 August 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/total-assets-adjusted-using-imf-accounting-records-assets-positions-us-dollar-per-square/cabo-verde/jordan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/total-assets-adjusted-using-imf-accounting-records-assets-positions-us-dollar-per-square/cabo-verde/jordan/">Cape Verde vs Jordan: Total assets, Adjusted using IMF accounting records (Assets)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Total assets, Adjusted using IMF accounting records (Assets, Positions, US dollar), per square kilometre
Unit: US dollar per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 169 places, 4,007 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed: 31 August 2026

Total assets, Adjusted using IMF accounting records (Assets, Positions, US dollar) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.