How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Uruguay?

25 years are reported by both, from 1999 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Total assets, Adjusted using IMF accounting records (Assets, Positions, US dollar), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Chile vs Uruguay: Total assets, Adjusted using IMF accounting records (Assets)

Chile

613,310 US dollar per square kilometre

in 2023

Uruguay

448,179 US dollar per square kilometre

in 2023

Chile rank

78th

Uruguay rank

81st

Total assets, Adjusted using IMF accounting records (Assets) over time

Chile
Uruguay

How they compare

Chile currently reports 613,310 US dollar per square kilometre against 448,179 US dollar per square kilometre in Uruguay, a difference of 165,131 US dollar per square kilometre.

That makes Chile's figure about 1.4 times Uruguay's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 25 shared years of data; in 1999 it was Uruguay ahead.

Chile ranks 78th and Uruguay ranks 81st of 169 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 3 and Uruguay in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Chile	Uruguay	Difference	Ahead
1990s	62,806 US dollar per square kilometre	72,833 US dollar per square kilometre	10,027 US dollar per square kilometre	Uruguay
2000s	144,298 US dollar per square kilometre	99,784 US dollar per square kilometre	44,514 US dollar per square kilometre	Chile
2010s	433,977 US dollar per square kilometre	320,634 US dollar per square kilometre	113,343 US dollar per square kilometre	Chile
2020s	588,457 US dollar per square kilometre	442,861 US dollar per square kilometre	145,596 US dollar per square kilometre	Chile

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher total assets, adjusted using imf accounting records (assets), Chile or Uruguay?: Chile, at 613,310 US dollar per square kilometre against 448,179 US dollar per square kilometre in Uruguay as of 2023.
What is the difference in total assets, adjusted using imf accounting records (assets) between Chile and Uruguay?: 165,131 US dollar per square kilometre, with Chile ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Uruguay?: 25 years are reported by both, from 1999 to 2023.
How do Chile and Uruguay rank globally for total assets, adjusted using imf accounting records (assets)?: Chile ranks 78th and Uruguay ranks 81st of 169 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Total assets, Adjusted using IMF accounting records (Assets, Positions, US dollar), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs Uruguay: Total assets, Adjusted using IMF accounting records (Assets). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 31 August 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/total-assets-adjusted-using-imf-accounting-records-assets-positions-us-dollar-per-square/chile/uruguay/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/total-assets-adjusted-using-imf-accounting-records-assets-positions-us-dollar-per-square/chile/uruguay/">Chile vs Uruguay: Total assets, Adjusted using IMF accounting records (Assets)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Total assets, Adjusted using IMF accounting records (Assets, Positions, US dollar), per square kilometre
Unit: US dollar per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 169 places, 4,007 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed: 31 August 2026

Total assets, Adjusted using IMF accounting records (Assets, Positions, US dollar) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.