How many years of comparable data are there for China and Latvia?

20 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Total assets, Adjusted using IMF accounting records (Assets, Positions, US dollar), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

China vs Latvia: Total assets, Adjusted using IMF accounting records (Assets)

China

1.03 million US dollar per square kilometre

in 2023

Latvia

922,859 US dollar per square kilometre

in 2023

China rank

63rd

Latvia rank

66th

Total assets, Adjusted using IMF accounting records (Assets) over time

China
Latvia

How they compare

China currently reports 1.03 million US dollar per square kilometre against 922,859 US dollar per square kilometre in Latvia, a difference of 102,341 US dollar per square kilometre.

That makes China's figure about 1.1 times Latvia's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 20 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Latvia ahead.

China ranks 63rd and Latvia ranks 66th of 169 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, China averaged higher in 2 and Latvia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade	China	Latvia	Difference	Ahead
2000s	226,022 US dollar per square kilometre	306,039 US dollar per square kilometre	80,017 US dollar per square kilometre	Latvia
2010s	659,192 US dollar per square kilometre	571,457 US dollar per square kilometre	87,735 US dollar per square kilometre	China
2020s	991,696 US dollar per square kilometre	853,764 US dollar per square kilometre	137,932 US dollar per square kilometre	China

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher total assets, adjusted using imf accounting records (assets), China or Latvia?: China, at 1.03 million US dollar per square kilometre against 922,859 US dollar per square kilometre in Latvia as of 2023.
What is the difference in total assets, adjusted using imf accounting records (assets) between China and Latvia?: 102,341 US dollar per square kilometre, with China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China and Latvia?: 20 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2023.
How do China and Latvia rank globally for total assets, adjusted using imf accounting records (assets)?: China ranks 63rd and Latvia ranks 66th of 169 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Total assets, Adjusted using IMF accounting records (Assets, Positions, US dollar), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China vs Latvia: Total assets, Adjusted using IMF accounting records (Assets). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 31 August 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/total-assets-adjusted-using-imf-accounting-records-assets-positions-us-dollar-per-square/china/latvia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/total-assets-adjusted-using-imf-accounting-records-assets-positions-us-dollar-per-square/china/latvia/">China vs Latvia: Total assets, Adjusted using IMF accounting records (Assets)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Total assets, Adjusted using IMF accounting records (Assets, Positions, US dollar), per square kilometre
Unit: US dollar per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 169 places, 4,007 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed: 31 August 2026

Total assets, Adjusted using IMF accounting records (Assets, Positions, US dollar) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.