China vs Timor-Leste: Total assets, Adjusted using IMF accounting records (Assets)

China
1.03 million US dollar per square kilometre
in 2023
Timor-Leste
1.39 million US dollar per square kilometre
in 2023
China rank
63rd
Timor-Leste rank
60th

Total assets, Adjusted using IMF accounting records (Assets) over time

  • China
  • Timor-Leste
0500.0k1.0M1.5M200420132023

How they compare

Timor-Leste currently reports 1.39 million US dollar per square kilometre against 1.03 million US dollar per square kilometre in China, a difference of 361,840 US dollar per square kilometre.

That makes Timor-Leste's figure about 1.4 times China's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 17 shared years of data; in 2007 it was China ahead.

China ranks 63rd and Timor-Leste ranks 60th of 169 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, China averaged higher in 1 and Timor-Leste in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade China Timor-Leste Difference Ahead
2000s 314,688 US dollar per square kilometre 289,910 US dollar per square kilometre 24,778 US dollar per square kilometre China
2010s 659,192 US dollar per square kilometre 1.04 million US dollar per square kilometre 378,982 US dollar per square kilometre Timor-Leste
2020s 991,696 US dollar per square kilometre 1.40 million US dollar per square kilometre 406,591 US dollar per square kilometre Timor-Leste

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher total assets, adjusted using imf accounting records (assets), China or Timor-Leste?
Timor-Leste, at 1.39 million US dollar per square kilometre against 1.03 million US dollar per square kilometre in China as of 2023.
What is the difference in total assets, adjusted using imf accounting records (assets) between China and Timor-Leste?
361,840 US dollar per square kilometre, with Timor-Leste ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China and Timor-Leste?
17 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2023.
How do China and Timor-Leste rank globally for total assets, adjusted using imf accounting records (assets)?
China ranks 63rd and Timor-Leste ranks 60th of 169 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Total assets, Adjusted using IMF accounting records (Assets, Positions, US dollar), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China vs Timor-Leste: Total assets, Adjusted using IMF accounting records (Assets). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 31 August 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/total-assets-adjusted-using-imf-accounting-records-assets-positions-us-dollar-per-square/china/timor-leste/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/total-assets-adjusted-using-imf-accounting-records-assets-positions-us-dollar-per-square/china/timor-leste/">China vs Timor-Leste: Total assets, Adjusted using IMF accounting records (Assets)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Total assets, Adjusted using IMF accounting records (Assets, Positions, US dollar), per square kilometre
Unit
US dollar per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
169 places, 4,007 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Total assets, Adjusted using IMF accounting records (Assets, Positions, US dollar) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.