Hong Kong, China vs Malta: Total assets, Adjusted using IMF accounting records (Assets)

Hong Kong, China
5.88 billion US dollar per square kilometre
in 2023
Malta
2.27 billion US dollar per square kilometre
in 2023
Hong Kong, China rank
2nd
Malta rank
4th

Total assets, Adjusted using IMF accounting records (Assets) over time

  • Hong Kong, China
  • Malta
02.0B4.0B6.0B199420082023

How they compare

Hong Kong, China currently reports 5.88 billion US dollar per square kilometre against 2.27 billion US dollar per square kilometre in Malta, a difference of 3.61 billion US dollar per square kilometre.

That makes Hong Kong, China's figure about 2.6 times Malta's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 27 shared years of data; in 1997 it was Hong Kong, China ahead.

Hong Kong, China ranks 2nd and Malta ranks 4th of 169 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Hong Kong, China averaged higher in 3 and Malta in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Hong Kong, China Malta Difference Ahead
1990s 21.97 million US dollar per square kilometre 25.72 million US dollar per square kilometre 3.75 million US dollar per square kilometre Malta
2000s 1.66 billion US dollar per square kilometre 193.64 million US dollar per square kilometre 1.47 billion US dollar per square kilometre Hong Kong, China
2010s 4.10 billion US dollar per square kilometre 1.06 billion US dollar per square kilometre 3.03 billion US dollar per square kilometre Hong Kong, China
2020s 5.94 billion US dollar per square kilometre 2.18 billion US dollar per square kilometre 3.76 billion US dollar per square kilometre Hong Kong, China

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher total assets, adjusted using imf accounting records (assets), Hong Kong, China or Malta?
Hong Kong, China, at 5.88 billion US dollar per square kilometre against 2.27 billion US dollar per square kilometre in Malta as of 2023.
What is the difference in total assets, adjusted using imf accounting records (assets) between Hong Kong, China and Malta?
3.61 billion US dollar per square kilometre, with Hong Kong, China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong, China and Malta?
27 years are reported by both, from 1997 to 2023.
How do Hong Kong, China and Malta rank globally for total assets, adjusted using imf accounting records (assets)?
Hong Kong, China ranks 2nd and Malta ranks 4th of 169 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Total assets, Adjusted using IMF accounting records (Assets, Positions, US dollar), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Hong Kong, China vs Malta: Total assets, Adjusted using IMF accounting records (Assets). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 September 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/total-assets-adjusted-using-imf-accounting-records-assets-positions-us-dollar-per-square/hong-kong-sar-china/malta/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/total-assets-adjusted-using-imf-accounting-records-assets-positions-us-dollar-per-square/hong-kong-sar-china/malta/">Hong Kong, China vs Malta: Total assets, Adjusted using IMF accounting records (Assets)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Total assets, Adjusted using IMF accounting records (Assets, Positions, US dollar), per square kilometre
Unit
US dollar per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
169 places, 4,007 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Total assets, Adjusted using IMF accounting records (Assets, Positions, US dollar) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.