Brazil vs Chinese Taipei: Total reserves (gold at market value) (SDR), annual growth rate

Brazil
3.54 % change on previous year
in 2025
Chinese Taipei
2.98 % change on previous year
in 2025
Brazil rank
127th
Chinese Taipei rank
129th

Total reserves (gold at market value) (SDR), annual growth rate over time

  • Brazil
  • Chinese Taipei
-50050100150200195119882025

How they compare

Brazil currently reports 3.54 % change on previous year against 2.98 % change on previous year in Chinese Taipei, a difference of 0.56 % change on previous year.

That makes Brazil's figure about 1.2 times Chinese Taipei's.

The two have swapped places 33 times across 75 shared years of data; in 1951 it was Chinese Taipei ahead.

Brazil ranks 127th and Chinese Taipei ranks 129th of 188 countries.

Across the 8 decades both report, Brazil averaged higher in 4 and Chinese Taipei in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Brazil Chinese Taipei Difference Ahead
1950s -3.29 % change on previous year 14.34 % change on previous year 17.63 % change on previous year Chinese Taipei
1960s 16.56 % change on previous year 16.92 % change on previous year 0.3595 % change on previous year Chinese Taipei
1970s 35.93 % change on previous year 17.56 % change on previous year 18.38 % change on previous year Brazil
1980s 11.06 % change on previous year 44.55 % change on previous year 33.49 % change on previous year Chinese Taipei
1990s 21.02 % change on previous year 3.24 % change on previous year 17.78 % change on previous year Brazil
2000s 22.1 % change on previous year 11.45 % change on previous year 10.65 % change on previous year Brazil
2010s 5.82 % change on previous year 4.59 % change on previous year 1.23 % change on previous year Brazil
2020s 0.3842 % change on previous year 5.02 % change on previous year 4.63 % change on previous year Chinese Taipei

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher total reserves (gold at market value) (sdr), annual growth rate, Brazil or Chinese Taipei?
Brazil, at 3.54 % change on previous year against 2.98 % change on previous year in Chinese Taipei as of 2025.
What is the difference in total reserves (gold at market value) (sdr), annual growth rate between Brazil and Chinese Taipei?
0.56 % change on previous year, with Brazil ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Chinese Taipei?
75 years are reported by both, from 1951 to 2025.
How do Brazil and Chinese Taipei rank globally for total reserves (gold at market value) (sdr), annual growth rate?
Brazil ranks 127th and Chinese Taipei ranks 129th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Total reserves (gold at market value) (SDR), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Brazil vs Chinese Taipei: Total reserves (gold at market value) (SDR), annual growth rate. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/total-reserves-gold-at-market-value-sdr-annual-growth-rate/brazil/taiwan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/total-reserves-gold-at-market-value-sdr-annual-growth-rate/brazil/taiwan/">Brazil vs Chinese Taipei: Total reserves (gold at market value) (SDR), annual growth rate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Total reserves (gold at market value) (SDR), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
208 places, 11,168 data points, 1951–2025
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Total reserves (gold at market value) (SDR). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.