Central African Economic and Monetary Community (CEMAC) vs Germany: Total reserves (gold at market value) (SDR), annual growth rate

Central African Economic and Monetary Community (CEMAC)
-50.88 % change on previous year
in 2016
Germany
44.18 % change on previous year
in 2025
Central African Economic and Monetary Community (CEMAC) rank
13th
Germany rank
14th

Total reserves (gold at market value) (SDR), annual growth rate over time

  • Central African Economic and Monetary Community (CEMAC)
  • Germany
-50050100150195119882025

How they compare

Germany currently reports 44.18 % change on previous year against -50.88 % change on previous year in Central African Economic and Monetary Community (CEMAC), a difference of 95.06 % change on previous year.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 16 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Germany ahead.

Central African Economic and Monetary Community (CEMAC) ranks 13th and Germany ranks 14th of 13 groups.

Across the 2 decades both report, Central African Economic and Monetary Community (CEMAC) averaged higher in 1 and Germany in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Central African Economic and Monetary Community (CEMAC) Germany Difference Ahead
2000s 31.41 % change on previous year 6.5 % change on previous year 24.91 % change on previous year Central African Economic and Monetary Community (CEMAC)
2010s -9.27 % change on previous year 3.43 % change on previous year 12.7 % change on previous year Germany

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher total reserves (gold at market value) (sdr), annual growth rate, Central African Economic and Monetary Community (CEMAC) or Germany?
Germany, at 44.18 % change on previous year against -50.88 % change on previous year in Central African Economic and Monetary Community (CEMAC) as of 2025.
What is the difference in total reserves (gold at market value) (sdr), annual growth rate between Central African Economic and Monetary Community (CEMAC) and Germany?
95.06 % change on previous year, with Germany ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Central African Economic and Monetary Community (CEMAC) and Germany?
16 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2016.
How do Central African Economic and Monetary Community (CEMAC) and Germany rank globally for total reserves (gold at market value) (sdr), annual growth rate?
Central African Economic and Monetary Community (CEMAC) ranks 13th and Germany ranks 14th of 13 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Total reserves (gold at market value) (SDR), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Central African Economic and Monetary Community (CEMAC) vs Germany: Total reserves (gold at market value) (SDR), annual growth rate. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/total-reserves-gold-at-market-value-sdr-annual-growth-rate/central-african-economic-and-monetary-community-cemac/germany/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/total-reserves-gold-at-market-value-sdr-annual-growth-rate/central-african-economic-and-monetary-community-cemac/germany/">Central African Economic and Monetary Community (CEMAC) vs Germany: Total reserves (gold at market value) (SDR), annual growth rate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Total reserves (gold at market value) (SDR), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
208 places, 11,168 data points, 1951–2025
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Total reserves (gold at market value) (SDR). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.