Barbados vs East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income): Total reserves in months of imports, per square kilometre

Barbados
0.0029 units per square kilometre
in 2017
East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)
0 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Barbados rank
18th
East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) rank
15th

Total reserves in months of imports, per square kilometre over time

  • Barbados
  • East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)
00.0030.0050.0070.010.013196719952023

How they compare

Barbados currently reports 0.0029 units per square kilometre against 0 units per square kilometre in East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income), a difference of 0.0029 units per square kilometre.

That makes Barbados's figure about 4,441.4 times East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)'s.

Across all 36 years both countries report, Barbados has been ahead every year.

Barbados ranks 18th and East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) ranks 15th of 177 countries.

Barbados has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Barbados East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) Difference Ahead
1980s 0.0049 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0.0049 units per square kilometre Barbados
1990s 0.0053 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0.0053 units per square kilometre Barbados
2000s 0.0091 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0.0091 units per square kilometre Barbados
2010s 0.0064 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0.0064 units per square kilometre Barbados

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher total reserves in months of imports, per square kilometre, Barbados or East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)?
Barbados, at 0.0029 units per square kilometre against 0 units per square kilometre in East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) as of 2017.
What is the difference in total reserves in months of imports, per square kilometre between Barbados and East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)?
0.0029 units per square kilometre, with Barbados ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)?
36 years are reported by both, from 1982 to 2017.
How do Barbados and East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) rank globally for total reserves in months of imports, per square kilometre?
Barbados ranks 18th and East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) ranks 15th of 177 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Total reserves in months of imports, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Barbados vs East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income): Total reserves in months of imports, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 18 September 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/total-reserves-in-months-of-imports-per-square-kilometre/barbados/east-asia-and-pacific-excluding-high-income/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/total-reserves-in-months-of-imports-per-square-kilometre/barbados/east-asia-and-pacific-excluding-high-income/">Barbados vs East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income): Total reserves in months of imports, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Total reserves in months of imports, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
224 places, 8,855 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Total reserves in months of imports divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.