East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) vs Hong Kong: Total reserves in months of imports, per square kilometre

East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries)
0 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Hong Kong
0.0054 units per square kilometre
in 2023
East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) rank
14th
Hong Kong rank
13th

Total reserves in months of imports, per square kilometre over time

  • East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries)
  • Hong Kong
00.0020.0040.0060.008198220022023

How they compare

Hong Kong currently reports 0.0054 units per square kilometre against 0 units per square kilometre in East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries), a difference of 0.0054 units per square kilometre.

That makes Hong Kong's figure about 8,173.2 times East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries)'s.

Across all 25 years both countries report, Hong Kong has been ahead every year.

East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) ranks 14th and Hong Kong ranks 13th of 44 groups.

Hong Kong has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) Hong Kong Difference Ahead
1990s 0 units per square kilometre 0.0047 units per square kilometre 0.0047 units per square kilometre Hong Kong
2000s 0 units per square kilometre 0.0046 units per square kilometre 0.0046 units per square kilometre Hong Kong
2010s 0 units per square kilometre 0.0054 units per square kilometre 0.0054 units per square kilometre Hong Kong
2020s 0 units per square kilometre 0.0061 units per square kilometre 0.0061 units per square kilometre Hong Kong

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher total reserves in months of imports, per square kilometre, East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) or Hong Kong?
Hong Kong, at 0.0054 units per square kilometre against 0 units per square kilometre in East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) as of 2023.
What is the difference in total reserves in months of imports, per square kilometre between East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) and Hong Kong?
0.0054 units per square kilometre, with Hong Kong ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) and Hong Kong?
25 years are reported by both, from 1998 to 2023.
How do East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) and Hong Kong rank globally for total reserves in months of imports, per square kilometre?
East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) ranks 14th and Hong Kong ranks 13th of 44 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Total reserves in months of imports, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) vs Hong Kong: Total reserves in months of imports, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 18 September 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/total-reserves-in-months-of-imports-per-square-kilometre/east-asia-and-pacific-ida-and-ibrd-countries/hong-kong-sar-china/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/total-reserves-in-months-of-imports-per-square-kilometre/east-asia-and-pacific-ida-and-ibrd-countries/hong-kong-sar-china/">East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) vs Hong Kong: Total reserves in months of imports, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Total reserves in months of imports, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
224 places, 8,855 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Total reserves in months of imports divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.