Georgia vs Serbia: Use of IMF Credit and Loans, Percent of quota per annum
Georgia
156.88
in 2025
Serbia
145
in 2025
Georgia rank
49th
Serbia rank
52nd
Use of IMF Credit and Loans, Percent of quota per annum over time
- Georgia
- Serbia
How they compare
Georgia currently reports 156.88 against 145 in Serbia, a difference of 11.88.
That makes Georgia's figure about 1.1 times Serbia's.
Across all 20 years both countries report, Georgia has been ahead every year.
Georgia ranks 49th and Serbia ranks 52nd of 194 countries.
Georgia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Georgia | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 185.73 | 63.27 | 122.47 | Georgia |
| 2010s | 178.26 | 99.31 | 78.95 | Georgia |
| 2020s | 200.99 | 92.5 | 108.49 | Georgia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher use of imf credit and loans, percent of quota per annum, Georgia or Serbia?
- Georgia, at 156.88 against 145 in Serbia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in use of imf credit and loans, percent of quota per annum between Georgia and Serbia?
- 11.88, with Georgia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and Serbia?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2025.
- How do Georgia and Serbia rank globally for use of imf credit and loans, percent of quota per annum?
- Georgia ranks 49th and Serbia ranks 52nd of 194 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Use of IMF Credit and Loans, Percent of quota per annum. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fund Accounts dataset provides information on IMF member countries' transactions with, and accounts with the Fund.