Grenada vs South Sudan: Use of IMF Credit and Loans, Percent of quota per annum
Grenada
97.32
in 2025
South Sudan
100
in 2025
Grenada rank
62nd
South Sudan rank
59th
Use of IMF Credit and Loans, Percent of quota per annum over time
- Grenada
- South Sudan
How they compare
South Sudan currently reports 100 against 97.32 in Grenada, a difference of 2.68.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 14 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Grenada ahead.
Grenada ranks 62nd and South Sudan ranks 59th of 194 countries.
Grenada has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Grenada | South Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 138.9 | 0 | 138.9 | Grenada |
| 2020s | 142.93 | 74.17 | 68.76 | Grenada |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher use of imf credit and loans, percent of quota per annum, Grenada or South Sudan?
- South Sudan, at 100 against 97.32 in Grenada as of 2025.
- What is the difference in use of imf credit and loans, percent of quota per annum between Grenada and South Sudan?
- 2.68, with South Sudan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Grenada and South Sudan?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2025.
- How do Grenada and South Sudan rank globally for use of imf credit and loans, percent of quota per annum?
- Grenada ranks 62nd and South Sudan ranks 59th of 194 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Use of IMF Credit and Loans, Percent of quota per annum. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fund Accounts dataset provides information on IMF member countries' transactions with, and accounts with the Fund.