Guinea vs Serbia: Use of IMF Credit and Loans, Percent of quota per annum
Guinea
139.36
in 2025
Serbia
145
in 2025
Guinea rank
53rd
Serbia rank
52nd
Use of IMF Credit and Loans, Percent of quota per annum over time
- Guinea
- Serbia
How they compare
Serbia currently reports 145 against 139.36 in Guinea, a difference of 5.64.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 20 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Guinea ahead.
Guinea ranks 53rd and Serbia ranks 52nd of 194 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Guinea averaged higher in 1 and Serbia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guinea | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 40.23 | 63.27 | 23.04 | Serbia |
| 2010s | 78.34 | 99.31 | 20.97 | Serbia |
| 2020s | 155.78 | 92.5 | 63.28 | Guinea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher use of imf credit and loans, percent of quota per annum, Guinea or Serbia?
- Serbia, at 145 against 139.36 in Guinea as of 2025.
- What is the difference in use of imf credit and loans, percent of quota per annum between Guinea and Serbia?
- 5.64, with Serbia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea and Serbia?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2025.
- How do Guinea and Serbia rank globally for use of imf credit and loans, percent of quota per annum?
- Guinea ranks 53rd and Serbia ranks 52nd of 194 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Use of IMF Credit and Loans, Percent of quota per annum. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fund Accounts dataset provides information on IMF member countries' transactions with, and accounts with the Fund.