Korea vs Latvia: Use of IMF Credit and Loans, Percent of quota per annum
Korea
0
in 2025
Latvia
0
in 2025
Korea rank
90th
Latvia rank
90th
Use of IMF Credit and Loans, Percent of quota per annum over time
- Korea
- Latvia
How they compare
Korea currently reports 0 against 0 in Latvia, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Latvia ahead.
Korea ranks 90th and Latvia ranks 90th of 194 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Korea averaged higher in 1 and Latvia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Korea | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 349.93 | 74.42 | 275.5 | Korea |
| 2000s | 27.32 | 103.32 | 76.01 | Latvia |
| 2010s | 0 | 146.59 | 146.59 | Latvia |
| 2020s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher use of imf credit and loans, percent of quota per annum, Korea or Latvia?
- Korea, at 0 against 0 in Latvia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in use of imf credit and loans, percent of quota per annum between Korea and Latvia?
- 0, with Korea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Korea and Latvia?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2025.
- How do Korea and Latvia rank globally for use of imf credit and loans, percent of quota per annum?
- Korea ranks 90th and Latvia ranks 90th of 194 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Use of IMF Credit and Loans, Percent of quota per annum. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fund Accounts dataset provides information on IMF member countries' transactions with, and accounts with the Fund.