South Korea vs Latvia: Use of IMF Credit and Loans, Percent of quota per annum
South Korea
0
in 2025
Latvia
0
in 2025
South Korea rank
90th
Latvia rank
90th
Use of IMF Credit and Loans, Percent of quota per annum over time
- South Korea
- Latvia
How they compare
South Korea currently reports 0 against 0 in Latvia, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Latvia ahead.
South Korea ranks 90th and Latvia ranks 90th of 194 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, South Korea averaged higher in 1 and Latvia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | South Korea | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 349.93 | 74.42 | 275.5 | South Korea |
| 2000s | 27.32 | 103.32 | 76.01 | Latvia |
| 2010s | 0 | 146.59 | 146.59 | Latvia |
| 2020s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher use of imf credit and loans, percent of quota per annum, South Korea or Latvia?
- South Korea, at 0 against 0 in Latvia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in use of imf credit and loans, percent of quota per annum between South Korea and Latvia?
- 0, with South Korea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for South Korea and Latvia?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2025.
- How do South Korea and Latvia rank globally for use of imf credit and loans, percent of quota per annum?
- South Korea ranks 90th and Latvia ranks 90th of 194 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Use of IMF Credit and Loans, Percent of quota per annum. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fund Accounts dataset provides information on IMF member countries' transactions with, and accounts with the Fund.