South Korea vs Vietnam: Use of IMF Credit and Loans, Percent of quota per annum
South Korea
0
in 2025
Vietnam
0
in 2025
South Korea rank
90th
Vietnam rank
90th
Use of IMF Credit and Loans, Percent of quota per annum over time
- South Korea
- Vietnam
How they compare
South Korea currently reports 0 against 0 in Vietnam, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 70 shared years of data; in 1956 it was Vietnam ahead.
South Korea ranks 90th and Vietnam ranks 90th of 194 countries.
Across the 8 decades both report, South Korea averaged higher in 3 and Vietnam in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | South Korea | Vietnam | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1950s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1960s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1970s | 132.81 | 22.7 | 110.1 | South Korea |
| 1980s | 234.88 | 54.06 | 180.82 | South Korea |
| 1990s | 279.94 | 82.78 | 197.16 | South Korea |
| 2000s | 27.32 | 52.23 | 24.91 | Vietnam |
| 2010s | 0 | 1.06 | 1.06 | Vietnam |
| 2020s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher use of imf credit and loans, percent of quota per annum, South Korea or Vietnam?
- South Korea, at 0 against 0 in Vietnam as of 2025.
- What is the difference in use of imf credit and loans, percent of quota per annum between South Korea and Vietnam?
- 0, with South Korea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for South Korea and Vietnam?
- 70 years are reported by both, from 1956 to 2025.
- How do South Korea and Vietnam rank globally for use of imf credit and loans, percent of quota per annum?
- South Korea ranks 90th and Vietnam ranks 90th of 194 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Use of IMF Credit and Loans, Percent of quota per annum. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fund Accounts dataset provides information on IMF member countries' transactions with, and accounts with the Fund.