Brazil vs Cuba: Use of IMF Credit and Loans, SDR, annual growth rate
Brazil
-100 % change on previous year
in 2005
Cuba
-100 % change on previous year
in 1969
Brazil rank
84th
Cuba rank
84th
Use of IMF Credit and Loans, SDR, annual growth rate over time
- Brazil
- Cuba
How they compare
Brazil currently reports -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Cuba, a difference of 0 % change on previous year.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 11 shared years of data; in 1958 it was Brazil ahead.
Brazil ranks 84th and Cuba ranks 84th of 156 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Brazil averaged higher in 1 and Cuba in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brazil | Cuba | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1950s | 36.5 % change on previous year | 0 % change on previous year | 36.5 % change on previous year | Brazil |
| 1960s | -16.53 % change on previous year | -14.26 % change on previous year | 2.27 % change on previous year | Cuba |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher use of imf credit and loans, sdr, annual growth rate, Brazil or Cuba?
- Brazil, at -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Cuba as of 2005.
- What is the difference in use of imf credit and loans, sdr, annual growth rate between Brazil and Cuba?
- 0 % change on previous year, with Brazil ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Cuba?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 1958 to 1968.
- How do Brazil and Cuba rank globally for use of imf credit and loans, sdr, annual growth rate?
- Brazil ranks 84th and Cuba ranks 84th of 156 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Use of IMF Credit and Loans, SDR, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Use of IMF Credit and Loans, SDR. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.