Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Iceland: Use of IMF Credit and Loans, US dollar, annual growth rate
Bosnia and Herzegovina
-68.78 % change on previous year
in 2025
Iceland
-100 % change on previous year
in 2015
Bosnia and Herzegovina rank
81st
Iceland rank
84th
Use of IMF Credit and Loans, US dollar, annual growth rate over time
- Bosnia and Herzegovina
- Iceland
How they compare
Bosnia and Herzegovina currently reports -68.78 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Iceland, a difference of 31.22 % change on previous year.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 6 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 81st and Iceland ranks 84th of 156 countries.
Bosnia and Herzegovina has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher use of imf credit and loans, us dollar, annual growth rate, Bosnia and Herzegovina or Iceland?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina, at -68.78 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Iceland as of 2025.
- What is the difference in use of imf credit and loans, us dollar, annual growth rate between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Iceland?
- 31.22 % change on previous year, with Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Iceland?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2015.
- How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Iceland rank globally for use of imf credit and loans, us dollar, annual growth rate?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 81st and Iceland ranks 84th of 156 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Use of IMF Credit and Loans, US dollar, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Use of IMF Credit and Loans, US dollar. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.