Bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets in Croatia
Croatia: Bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets was 24.9% in 2020. ▲ Rising
Bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets in Croatia, 1998–2020
Source: Financial Soundness Indicators Database (fsi.imf.org), International Monetary Fund (IMF). Measured in %.
Analysis
In 2020, bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets in Croatia stood at 24.9%. That is the highest value across all 23 years on record.
That represents a change of up 7.2% on the previous year and up 32.6% over ten years.
Over the whole period, bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets in Croatia peaked at 24.9% in 2020 and was at its lowest, 12.7%, in 1998.
That places Croatia 16th out of 141 countries with data for 2020, putting it in the top quarter.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 23 years of available data.
Bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets in Croatia, year by year
| Year | % | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1998 | 12.7% | — |
| 1999 | 20.6% | +62.2% |
| 2000 | 21.3% | +3.4% |
| 2001 | 18.5% | -13.1% |
| 2002 | 17.4% | -5.9% |
| 2003 | 16.5% | -5.2% |
| 2004 | 16.0% | -3.0% |
| 2005 | 15.2% | -5.0% |
| 2006 | 14.0% | -7.9% |
| 2007 | 16.3% | +16.4% |
| 2008 | 15.1% | -7.4% |
| 2009 | 16.4% | +8.6% |
| 2010 | 18.8% | +14.6% |
| 2011 | 20.5% | +8.9% |
| 2012 | 20.9% | +2.1% |
| 2013 | 20.9% | -0.1% |
| 2014 | 21.8% | +4.5% |
| 2015 | 21.0% | -3.8% |
| 2016 | 22.5% | +7.4% |
| 2017 | 23.2% | +3.1% |
| 2018 | 22.9% | -1.4% |
| 2019 | 23.2% | +1.4% |
| 2020 | 24.9% | +7.2% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 16.6% | 12.7% | 20.6% | 2 |
| 2000s | 16.7% | 14.0% | 21.3% | 10 |
| 2010s | 21.6% | 18.8% | 23.2% | 10 |
| 2020s | 24.9% | 24.9% | 24.9% | 1 |
Countries ranked near Croatia
More financial sector data for Croatia
- Reserve position in the IMF, US dollar, annual growth rate -2.8 % change on previous year (2024)
- Reserve position in the IMF, US dollar, per unit of GDP 0.0005 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Reserve position in the IMF, US dollar, per capita 12.53 units per person (2025)
- Reserve position in the IMF, SDR, annual growth rate 0 % change on previous year (2024)
- Reserve position in the IMF, SDR, per unit of GDP 0.0003 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Reserve position in the IMF, SDR, per capita 9.15 units per person (2025)
- Reserve tranche position, US dollar, annual growth rate -2.8 % change on previous year (2024)
- Reserve tranche position, US dollar, per unit of GDP 0.0005 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Reserve tranche position, US dollar, per capita 12.53 units per person (2025)
- Reserve tranche position, SDR, annual growth rate 0 % change on previous year (2024)
Frequently asked questions
- What is bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets in Croatia?
- Bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets in Croatia was 24.9% in 2020, according to Financial Soundness Indicators Database (fsi.imf.org), International Monetary Fund (IMF).
- What is the highest bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets recorded in Croatia?
- The highest recorded value was 24.9% in 2020.
- What is the lowest bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets recorded in Croatia?
- The lowest recorded value was 12.7% in 1998.
- How does Croatia rank for bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets?
- Croatia ranks 16th out of 141 countries with data for 2020.
- Is bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets rising or falling in Croatia?
- Over the last ten years it is up 32.6%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Croatia data come from?
- The figures come from Financial Soundness Indicators Database (fsi.imf.org), International Monetary Fund (IMF), published as part of Bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets (%). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 23 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Reported by IMF staff. Note that due to differences in national accounting, taxation, and supervisory regimes, these data are not strictly comparable across countries.