Bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets in Indonesia
Indonesia: Bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets was 23.8% in 2020. ▲ Rising
Bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets in Indonesia, 2000–2020
Source: Financial Soundness Indicators Database (fsi.imf.org), International Monetary Fund (IMF). Measured in %.
Analysis
In 2020, bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets in Indonesia stood at 23.8%. That is the highest value across all 21 years on record.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 2.1% on the previous year and up 47.2% over ten years.
Over the whole period, bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets in Indonesia peaked at 23.8% in 2020 and was at its lowest, 16.1%, in 2011.
That places Indonesia 21st out of 141 countries with data for 2020, putting it in the top quarter.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 21 years of available data.
Bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets in Indonesia, year by year
| Year | % | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2000 | 21.6% | — |
| 2001 | 18.2% | -15.7% |
| 2002 | 20.1% | +10.4% |
| 2003 | 22.3% | +10.9% |
| 2004 | 19.4% | -13.0% |
| 2005 | 19.3% | -0.5% |
| 2006 | 21.3% | +10.4% |
| 2007 | 20.2% | -5.2% |
| 2008 | 17.5% | -13.4% |
| 2009 | 17.8% | +1.7% |
| 2010 | 16.2% | -9.1% |
| 2011 | 16.1% | -0.6% |
| 2012 | 17.3% | +7.7% |
| 2013 | 19.8% | +14.4% |
| 2014 | 18.7% | -5.5% |
| 2015 | 21.3% | +13.7% |
| 2016 | 22.7% | +6.6% |
| 2017 | 23.0% | +1.4% |
| 2018 | 22.9% | -0.5% |
| 2019 | 23.3% | +1.8% |
| 2020 | 23.8% | +2.1% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 19.8% | 17.5% | 22.3% | 10 |
| 2010s | 20.1% | 16.1% | 23.3% | 10 |
| 2020s | 23.8% | 23.8% | 23.8% | 1 |
Countries ranked near Indonesia
More financial sector data for Indonesia
- Reserve position in the IMF, US dollar, annual growth rate 5.01 % change on previous year (2025)
- Reserve position in the IMF, US dollar, per unit of GDP 0.0008 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Reserve position in the IMF, US dollar, per capita 3.8 units per person (2025)
- Reserve position in the IMF, SDR, annual growth rate 0 % change on previous year (2025)
- Reserve position in the IMF, SDR, per unit of GDP 0.0005 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Reserve position in the IMF, SDR, per capita 2.78 units per person (2025)
- Reserve tranche position, US dollar, annual growth rate 5.01 % change on previous year (2025)
- Reserve tranche position, US dollar, per unit of GDP 0.0008 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Reserve tranche position, US dollar, per capita 3.8 units per person (2025)
- Reserve tranche position, SDR, annual growth rate 0 % change on previous year (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets in Indonesia?
- Bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets in Indonesia was 23.8% in 2020, according to Financial Soundness Indicators Database (fsi.imf.org), International Monetary Fund (IMF).
- What is the highest bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets recorded in Indonesia?
- The highest recorded value was 23.8% in 2020.
- What is the lowest bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets recorded in Indonesia?
- The lowest recorded value was 16.1% in 2011.
- How does Indonesia rank for bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets?
- Indonesia ranks 21st out of 141 countries with data for 2020.
- Is bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets rising or falling in Indonesia?
- Over the last ten years it is up 47.2%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Indonesia data come from?
- The figures come from Financial Soundness Indicators Database (fsi.imf.org), International Monetary Fund (IMF), published as part of Bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets (%). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 21 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Reported by IMF staff. Note that due to differences in national accounting, taxation, and supervisory regimes, these data are not strictly comparable across countries.