Bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets in Maldives

Maldives: Bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets was 46.3% in 2020. ▲ Rising

Latest (2020)
46.3%
Change on year
down 1.0%
World rank
1st
of 141 countries
All-time high
46.8%
in 2019
All-time low
35.9%
in 2012
Years of data
9
2012–2020

Bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets in Maldives, 2012–2020

010203040502012201620202012: 35.9 %2013: 41.1 %2014: 44.5 %2015: 37.2 %2016: 44.5 %2017: 44.8 %2018: 44.2 %2019: 46.8 %2020: 46.3 %

Source: Financial Soundness Indicators Database (fsi.imf.org), International Monetary Fund (IMF). Measured in %.

Analysis

In 2020, bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets in Maldives stood at 46.3%.

Compared with earlier readings it is down 1.0% on the previous year and up 29.3% over ten years.

Over the whole period, bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets in Maldives peaked at 46.8% in 2019 and was at its lowest, 35.9%, in 2012.

That places Maldives 1st out of 141 countries with data for 2020, putting it in the top 10%.

Bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets in Maldives, year by year

Annual values for Bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets (%) in Maldives, 2012 to 2020.
Year % Change
2012 35.9%
2013 41.1% +14.5%
2014 44.5% +8.3%
2015 37.2% -16.3%
2016 44.5% +19.5%
2017 44.8% +0.7%
2018 44.2% -1.2%
2019 46.8% +5.8%
2020 46.3% -1.0%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2010s 42.4% 35.9% 46.8% 8
2020s 46.3% 46.3% 46.3% 1

Countries ranked near Maldives

  1. 2 Sierra Leone 34.0%
  2. 3 Solomon Islands 32.6% compare
  3. 4 Tonga 30.5% compare

See the full ranking of 141 places →

More financial sector data for Maldives

All data for Maldives →

Frequently asked questions

What is bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets in Maldives?
Bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets in Maldives was 46.3% in 2020, according to Financial Soundness Indicators Database (fsi.imf.org), International Monetary Fund (IMF).
What is the highest bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets recorded in Maldives?
The highest recorded value was 46.8% in 2019.
What is the lowest bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets recorded in Maldives?
The lowest recorded value was 35.9% in 2012.
How does Maldives rank for bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets?
Maldives ranks 1st out of 141 countries with data for 2020.
Is bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets rising or falling in Maldives?
Over the last ten years it is up 29.3%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
Where does this Maldives data come from?
The figures come from Financial Soundness Indicators Database (fsi.imf.org), International Monetary Fund (IMF), published as part of Bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets (%). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 9 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets in Maldives. Statizoid, drawing on Financial Soundness Indicators Database (fsi.imf.org), International Monetary Fund (IMF). Retrieved 08 September 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/stat/bank-regulatory-capital-to-risk-weighted-assets-percent/maldives/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/stat/bank-regulatory-capital-to-risk-weighted-assets-percent/maldives/">Bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets in Maldives</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets (%)
Unit
%
Source
Financial Soundness Indicators Database (fsi.imf.org), International Monetary Fund (IMF)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
141 places, 2,480 data points, 1998–2020
Last refreshed

Reported by IMF staff. Note that due to differences in national accounting, taxation, and supervisory regimes, these data are not strictly comparable across countries.