Bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets in Thailand
Thailand: Bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets was 19.8% in 2020. ▲ Rising
Bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets in Thailand, 1998–2020
Source: Financial Soundness Indicators Database (fsi.imf.org), International Monetary Fund (IMF). Measured in %.
Analysis
In 2020, bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets in Thailand stood at 19.8%. That is the highest value across all 23 years on record.
That represents a change of up 2.1% on the previous year and up 22.8% over ten years.
Over the whole period, bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets in Thailand peaked at 19.8% in 2020 and was at its lowest, 10.9%, in 1998.
That places Thailand 53rd out of 141 countries with data for 2020, putting it in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 23 years of available data.
Bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets in Thailand, year by year
| Year | % | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1998 | 10.9% | — |
| 1999 | 12.4% | +13.8% |
| 2000 | 11.3% | -8.9% |
| 2001 | 13.3% | +17.7% |
| 2002 | 13.0% | -2.3% |
| 2003 | 13.4% | +3.1% |
| 2004 | 12.4% | -7.5% |
| 2005 | 13.2% | +6.5% |
| 2006 | 13.6% | +3.0% |
| 2007 | 14.8% | +8.8% |
| 2008 | 13.9% | -6.1% |
| 2009 | 15.8% | +13.7% |
| 2010 | 16.1% | +1.8% |
| 2011 | 14.8% | -7.9% |
| 2012 | 16.2% | +9.2% |
| 2013 | 15.5% | -4.4% |
| 2014 | 16.5% | +6.9% |
| 2015 | 17.1% | +3.6% |
| 2016 | 17.8% | +3.8% |
| 2017 | 18.0% | +1.1% |
| 2018 | 17.9% | -0.4% |
| 2019 | 19.3% | +8.2% |
| 2020 | 19.8% | +2.1% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 11.7% | 10.9% | 12.4% | 2 |
| 2000s | 13.5% | 11.3% | 15.8% | 10 |
| 2010s | 16.9% | 14.8% | 19.3% | 10 |
| 2020s | 19.8% | 19.8% | 19.8% | 1 |
Countries ranked near Thailand
More financial sector data for Thailand
- Reserve position in the IMF, US dollar, annual growth rate 8.39 % change on previous year (2025)
- Reserve position in the IMF, US dollar, per unit of GDP 0.002 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Reserve position in the IMF, US dollar, per capita 16.06 units per person (2025)
- Reserve position in the IMF, SDR, annual growth rate 3.21 % change on previous year (2025)
- Reserve position in the IMF, SDR, per unit of GDP 0.0015 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Reserve position in the IMF, SDR, per capita 11.73 units per person (2025)
- Reserve tranche position, US dollar, annual growth rate 8.39 % change on previous year (2025)
- Reserve tranche position, US dollar, per unit of GDP 0.002 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Reserve tranche position, US dollar, per capita 16.06 units per person (2025)
- Reserve tranche position, SDR, annual growth rate 3.21 % change on previous year (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets in Thailand?
- Bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets in Thailand was 19.8% in 2020, according to Financial Soundness Indicators Database (fsi.imf.org), International Monetary Fund (IMF).
- What is the highest bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets recorded in Thailand?
- The highest recorded value was 19.8% in 2020.
- What is the lowest bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets recorded in Thailand?
- The lowest recorded value was 10.9% in 1998.
- How does Thailand rank for bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets?
- Thailand ranks 53rd out of 141 countries with data for 2020.
- Is bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets rising or falling in Thailand?
- Over the last ten years it is up 22.8%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Thailand data come from?
- The figures come from Financial Soundness Indicators Database (fsi.imf.org), International Monetary Fund (IMF), published as part of Bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets (%). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 23 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Reported by IMF staff. Note that due to differences in national accounting, taxation, and supervisory regimes, these data are not strictly comparable across countries.