Domestic Claims (Depository Corporations Survey, Domestic currency) in Iceland
Iceland: Domestic Claims (Depository Corporations Survey, Domestic currency) was 35.51 million units per square kilometre in 2006. ◆ Volatile
Domestic Claims (Depository Corporations Survey, Domestic currency) in Iceland, 1961–2006
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in units per square kilometre.
Analysis
The most recent figure for domestic claims (depository corporations survey, domestic currency) in Iceland is 35.51 million units per square kilometre, measured in 2006. That is the highest value across all 46 years on record.
The figure is up 43.1% on the previous year and up 1,275.7% over ten years.
Over the whole period, domestic claims (depository corporations survey, domestic currency) in Iceland peaked at 35.51 million units per square kilometre in 2006 and was at its lowest, 484.29 units per square kilometre, in 1961.
Iceland ranks 33rd of 172 countries on this measure, in the top quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Domestic Claims (Depository Corporations Survey, Domestic currency) in Iceland, year by year
| Year | units per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 484.29 units per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 547.03 units per square kilometre | +13.0% |
| 1963 | 609.78 units per square kilometre | +11.5% |
| 1964 | 620.55 units per square kilometre | +1.8% |
| 1965 | 759.14 units per square kilometre | +22.3% |
| 1966 | 856.37 units per square kilometre | +12.8% |
| 1967 | 1,129 units per square kilometre | +31.8% |
| 1968 | 1,344 units per square kilometre | +19.1% |
| 1969 | 1,443 units per square kilometre | +7.4% |
| 1970 | 1,681 units per square kilometre | +16.5% |
| 1971 | 1,978 units per square kilometre | +17.7% |
| 1972 | 2,328 units per square kilometre | +17.7% |
| 1973 | 3,208 units per square kilometre | +37.8% |
| 1974 | 5,187 units per square kilometre | +61.7% |
| 1975 | 7,750 units per square kilometre | +49.4% |
| 1976 | 9,688 units per square kilometre | +25.0% |
| 1977 | 12,946 units per square kilometre | +33.6% |
| 1978 | 18,641 units per square kilometre | +44.0% |
| 1979 | 27,877 units per square kilometre | +49.6% |
| 1980 | 45,986 units per square kilometre | +65.0% |
| 1981 | 76,119 units per square kilometre | +65.5% |
| 1982 | 145,748 units per square kilometre | +91.5% |
| 1983 | 275,736 units per square kilometre | +89.2% |
| 1984 | 383,333 units per square kilometre | +39.0% |
| 1985 | 518,741 units per square kilometre | +35.3% |
| 1986 | 588,932 units per square kilometre | +13.5% |
| 1987 | 841,027 units per square kilometre | +42.8% |
| 1988 | 1.18 million units per square kilometre | +40.5% |
| 1989 | 1.68 million units per square kilometre | +42.1% |
| 1990 | 1.83 million units per square kilometre | +9.0% |
| 1991 | 2.04 million units per square kilometre | +11.2% |
| 1992 | 2.13 million units per square kilometre | +4.7% |
| 1993 | 2.31 million units per square kilometre | +8.2% |
| 1994 | 2.41 million units per square kilometre | +4.7% |
| 1995 | 2.38 million units per square kilometre | -1.5% |
| 1996 | 2.58 million units per square kilometre | +8.6% |
| 1997 | 3.70 million units per square kilometre | +43.5% |
| 1998 | 3.82 million units per square kilometre | +3.1% |
| 1999 | 4.66 million units per square kilometre | +22.2% |
| 2000 | 6.70 million units per square kilometre | +43.6% |
| 2001 | 7.78 million units per square kilometre | +16.1% |
| 2002 | 8.53 million units per square kilometre | +9.7% |
| 2003 | 10.94 million units per square kilometre | +28.2% |
| 2004 | 15.23 million units per square kilometre | +39.3% |
| 2005 | 24.80 million units per square kilometre | +62.8% |
| 2006 | 35.51 million units per square kilometre | +43.1% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 865.82 units per square kilometre | 484.29 units per square kilometre | 1,443 units per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | 9,128 units per square kilometre | 1,681 units per square kilometre | 27,877 units per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 573,566 units per square kilometre | 45,986 units per square kilometre | 1.68 million units per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 2.79 million units per square kilometre | 1.83 million units per square kilometre | 4.66 million units per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 15.64 million units per square kilometre | 6.70 million units per square kilometre | 35.51 million units per square kilometre | 7 |
Countries ranked near Iceland
- 30 Austria 40.25 million units per square kilometre compare
- 31 Cambodia 38.58 million units per square kilometre compare
- 32 Paraguay 38.56 million units per square kilometre compare
- 34 China 34.70 million units per square kilometre compare
- 35 Israel 30.43 million units per square kilometre compare
- 36 Switzerland 29.97 million units per square kilometre compare
More financial sector data for Iceland
- Reserve position in the IMF, US dollar, annual growth rate 5.01 % change on previous year (2025)
- Reserve position in the IMF, US dollar, per unit of GDP 0.0025 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Reserve position in the IMF, US dollar, per capita 243.62 units per person (2025)
- Reserve position in the IMF, SDR, annual growth rate 0 % change on previous year (2025)
- Reserve position in the IMF, SDR, per unit of GDP 0.0018 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Reserve position in the IMF, SDR, per capita 177.89 units per person (2025)
- Reserve tranche position, US dollar, annual growth rate 5.01 % change on previous year (2025)
- Reserve tranche position, US dollar, per unit of GDP 0.0025 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Reserve tranche position, US dollar, per capita 243.62 units per person (2025)
- Reserve tranche position, SDR, annual growth rate 0 % change on previous year (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is domestic claims (depository corporations survey, domestic currency) in Iceland?
- Domestic claims (depository corporations survey, domestic currency) in Iceland was 35.51 million units per square kilometre in 2006, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest domestic claims (depository corporations survey, domestic currency) recorded in Iceland?
- The highest recorded value was 35.51 million units per square kilometre in 2006.
- What is the lowest domestic claims (depository corporations survey, domestic currency) recorded in Iceland?
- The lowest recorded value was 484.29 units per square kilometre in 1961.
- How does Iceland rank for domestic claims (depository corporations survey, domestic currency)?
- Iceland ranks 33rd out of 172 countries with data for 2006.
- Is domestic claims (depository corporations survey, domestic currency) rising or falling in Iceland?
- Over the last ten years it is up 1,275.7%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Iceland data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Domestic Claims (Depository Corporations Survey, Domestic currency), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 46 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Domestic Claims (Depository Corporations Survey, Domestic currency) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Domestic Claims (Depository Corporations Survey, Domestic currency) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Domestic Claims International Monetary Fund
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Domestic Claims (Depository Corporations Survey, Domestic currency) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.