Financial Institutions Access Index in Uruguay

Uruguay: Financial Institutions Access Index was 0.6128 in 2020. β–² Rising

Latest (2020)
0.6128
Change on year
up 0.3%
World rank
31st
of 183 countries
All-time high
0.6132
in 2018
All-time low
0.1616
in 1996
Years of data
41
1980–2020

Financial Institutions Access Index in Uruguay, 1980–2020

0.20.30.40.50.61980200020201980: 0.2411981: 0.2611982: 0.4521983: 0.3091984: 0.271985: 0.2931986: 0.2611987: 0.211988: 0.2291989: 0.2331990: 0.2011991: 0.181992: 0.1791993: 0.1711994: 0.171995: 0.1731996: 0.1621997: 0.1631998: 0.2011999: 0.2182000: 0.2322001: 0.2562002: 0.272003: 0.2662004: 0.2682005: 0.2682006: 0.2742007: 0.2752008: 0.2772009: 0.2852010: 0.3042011: 0.3282012: 0.3332013: 0.3422014: 0.3692015: 0.3782016: 0.4942017: 0.5012018: 0.6132019: 0.6112020: 0.613

Source: International Monetary Fund.

Analysis

Uruguay recorded 0.6128 for financial institutions access index in 2020.

Compared with earlier readings it is up 0.3% on the previous year and up 101.8% over ten years.

Over the whole period, financial institutions access index in Uruguay peaked at 0.6132 in 2018 and was at its lowest, 0.1616, in 1996.

Uruguay ranks 31st of 183 countries on this measure, in the top quarter.

The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 41 years of available data.

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
1980s 0.276 0.2097 0.4522 10
1990s 0.1818 0.1616 0.2182 10
2000s 0.2671 0.2319 0.2853 10
2010s 0.4272 0.3036 0.6132 10
2020s 0.6128 0.6128 0.6128 1

Countries ranked near Uruguay

  1. 28 Slovenia 0.6285 compare
  2. 29 Aruba 0.6278 compare
  3. 30 Thailand 0.6157 compare
  4. 32 Germany 0.6056 compare
  5. 33 Bosnia and Herzegovina 0.5948 compare
  6. 34 Poland 0.5912 compare

See the full ranking of 192 places β†’

More financial sector data for Uruguay

All data for Uruguay β†’

Frequently asked questions

What is financial institutions access index in Uruguay?
Financial institutions access index in Uruguay was 0.6128 in 2020, according to International Monetary Fund.
What is the highest financial institutions access index recorded in Uruguay?
The highest recorded value was 0.6132 in 2018.
What is the lowest financial institutions access index recorded in Uruguay?
The lowest recorded value was 0.1616 in 1996.
How does Uruguay rank for financial institutions access index?
Uruguay ranks 31st out of 183 countries with data for 2020.
Is financial institutions access index rising or falling in Uruguay?
Over the last ten years it is up 101.8%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
Where does this Uruguay data come from?
The figures come from International Monetary Fund, published as part of Financial Institutions Access Index. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV Β· JSON β€” 41 observations, free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Financial Institutions Access Index in Uruguay. Statizoid, drawing on International Monetary Fund. Retrieved 20 August 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/stat/financial-institutions-access-index/uruguay/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/stat/financial-institutions-access-index/uruguay/">Financial Institutions Access Index in Uruguay</a> β€” Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Financial Institutions Access Index
Source
International Monetary Fund
Licence
IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
192 places, 7,872 data points, 1980–2020
Last refreshed

The dataset contains nine indices that summarize how developed financial institutions and financial markets are in terms of their depth, access, and efficiency. These indices are aggregated into an overall index of financial development. With the coverage of over 180 countries on annual frequency from 1980 onwards, the database should offer a useful analytical tool for researchers and policy makers.