Financial Institutions Depth Index in Iceland

Iceland: Financial Institutions Depth Index was 0.7161 in 2020. β–² Rising

Latest (2020)
0.7161
Change on year
up 7.2%
World rank
22nd
of 183 countries
All-time high
0.8265
in 2007
All-time low
0.2429
in 1980
Years of data
41
1980–2020

Financial Institutions Depth Index in Iceland, 1980–2020

0.20.40.60.81980200020201980: 0.2431981: 0.2661982: 0.331983: 0.3481984: 0.3611985: 0.3481986: 0.3021987: 0.3241988: 0.3611989: 0.4181990: 0.3821991: 0.411992: 0.4281993: 0.4181994: 0.431995: 0.4081996: 0.4411997: 0.481998: 0.5081999: 0.542000: 0.5722001: 0.5912002: 0.6232003: 0.7182004: 0.7442005: 0.7892006: 0.7952007: 0.8272008: 0.6422009: 0.642010: 0.6692011: 0.692012: 0.682013: 0.6592014: 0.6282015: 0.6392016: 0.6722017: 0.6722018: 0.6652019: 0.6682020: 0.716

Source: International Monetary Fund.

Analysis

In 2020, financial institutions depth index in Iceland stood at 0.7161.

That represents a change of up 7.2% on the previous year and up 7.0% over ten years.

Over the whole period, financial institutions depth index in Iceland peaked at 0.8265 in 2007 and was at its lowest, 0.2429, in 1980.

That places Iceland 22nd out of 183 countries with data for 2020, putting it in the top quarter.

The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 41 years of available data.

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
1980s 0.3302 0.2429 0.418 10
1990s 0.4447 0.3824 0.5401 10
2000s 0.6941 0.572 0.8265 10
2010s 0.6643 0.6275 0.6899 10
2020s 0.7161 0.7161 0.7161 1

Countries ranked near Iceland

  1. 19 New Zealand 0.77 compare
  2. 20 Norway 0.7505 compare
  3. 21 Luxembourg 0.7481 compare
  4. 23 Jamaica 0.7113 compare
  5. 24 Chile 0.707 compare
  6. 25 Malta 0.7026 compare

See the full ranking of 192 places β†’

More financial sector data for Iceland

All data for Iceland β†’

Frequently asked questions

What is financial institutions depth index in Iceland?
Financial institutions depth index in Iceland was 0.7161 in 2020, according to International Monetary Fund.
What is the highest financial institutions depth index recorded in Iceland?
The highest recorded value was 0.8265 in 2007.
What is the lowest financial institutions depth index recorded in Iceland?
The lowest recorded value was 0.2429 in 1980.
How does Iceland rank for financial institutions depth index?
Iceland ranks 22nd out of 183 countries with data for 2020.
Is financial institutions depth index rising or falling in Iceland?
Over the last ten years it is up 7.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
Where does this Iceland data come from?
The figures come from International Monetary Fund, published as part of Financial Institutions Depth Index. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV Β· JSON β€” 41 observations, free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Financial Institutions Depth Index in Iceland. Statizoid, drawing on International Monetary Fund. Retrieved 19 August 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/stat/financial-institutions-depth-index/iceland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/stat/financial-institutions-depth-index/iceland/">Financial Institutions Depth Index in Iceland</a> β€” Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Financial Institutions Depth Index
Source
International Monetary Fund
Licence
IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
192 places, 7,872 data points, 1980–2020
Last refreshed

The dataset contains nine indices that summarize how developed financial institutions and financial markets are in terms of their depth, access, and efficiency. These indices are aggregated into an overall index of financial development. With the coverage of over 180 countries on annual frequency from 1980 onwards, the database should offer a useful analytical tool for researchers and policy makers.