Financial Markets Access Index in Singapore

Singapore: Financial Markets Access Index was 0.8241 in 2020. β–² Rising

Latest (2020)
0.8241
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
10th
of 183 countries
All-time high
0.8995
in 2001
All-time low
0.3733
in 1994
Years of data
41
1980–2020

Financial Markets Access Index in Singapore, 1980–2020

00.20.40.60.81980200020201980: 0.4351981: 0.4731982: 0.431983: 0.4231984: 0.3811985: 0.391986: 0.5631987: 0.5861988: 0.5521989: 0.5541990: 0.531991: 0.4911992: 0.4571993: 0.3961994: 0.3731995: 0.4481996: 0.4861997: 0.4821998: 0.4881999: 0.7212000: 0.8872001: 0.8992002: 0.8792003: 0.8222004: 0.8182005: 0.7612006: 0.752007: 0.7132008: 0.7912009: 0.722010: 0.6872011: 0.6712012: 0.6752013: 0.6792014: 0.6842015: 0.6772016: 0.6772017: 0.8242018: 0.8242019: 0.8242020: 0.824

Source: International Monetary Fund.

Analysis

In 2020, financial markets access index in Singapore stood at 0.8241.

The figure is up 19.9% over ten years.

Over the whole period, financial markets access index in Singapore peaked at 0.8995 in 2001 and was at its lowest, 0.3733, in 1994.

That places Singapore 10th out of 183 countries with data for 2020, putting it in the top 10%.

The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 41 years of available data.

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
1980s 0.4785 0.381 0.5859 10
1990s 0.4872 0.3733 0.7213 10
2000s 0.8041 0.7132 0.8995 10
2010s 0.7223 0.6709 0.8241 10
2020s 0.8241 0.8241 0.8241 1

Countries ranked near Singapore

  1. 7 New Zealand 0.8595 compare
  2. 8 Spain 0.8376 compare
  3. 9 United Arab Emirates 0.8264 compare
  4. 11 Panama 0.7726 compare
  5. 12 Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China 0.7677 compare
  6. 13 Austria 0.7676 compare

See the full ranking of 192 places β†’

More financial sector data for Singapore

All data for Singapore β†’

Frequently asked questions

What is financial markets access index in Singapore?
Financial markets access index in Singapore was 0.8241 in 2020, according to International Monetary Fund.
What is the highest financial markets access index recorded in Singapore?
The highest recorded value was 0.8995 in 2001.
What is the lowest financial markets access index recorded in Singapore?
The lowest recorded value was 0.3733 in 1994.
How does Singapore rank for financial markets access index?
Singapore ranks 10th out of 183 countries with data for 2020.
Is financial markets access index rising or falling in Singapore?
Over the last ten years it is up 19.9%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
Where does this Singapore data come from?
The figures come from International Monetary Fund, published as part of Financial Markets Access Index. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV Β· JSON β€” 41 observations, free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Financial Markets Access Index in Singapore. Statizoid, drawing on International Monetary Fund. Retrieved 19 August 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/stat/financial-markets-access-index/singapore/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/stat/financial-markets-access-index/singapore/">Financial Markets Access Index in Singapore</a> β€” Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Financial Markets Access Index
Source
International Monetary Fund
Licence
IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
192 places, 7,872 data points, 1980–2020
Last refreshed

The dataset contains nine indices that summarize how developed financial institutions and financial markets are in terms of their depth, access, and efficiency. These indices are aggregated into an overall index of financial development. With the coverage of over 180 countries on annual frequency from 1980 onwards, the database should offer a useful analytical tool for researchers and policy makers.