Financial Markets Efficiency Index in Myanmar

Myanmar: Financial Markets Efficiency Index was 0 in 2020. β–¬ Flat

Latest (2020)
0
World rank
94th
of 183 countries
All-time high
0
in 1980
All-time low
0
in 1980
Years of data
41
1980–2020

Financial Markets Efficiency Index in Myanmar, 1980–2020

00.20.40.60.811980200020201980: 01981: 01982: 01983: 01984: 01985: 01986: 01987: 01988: 01989: 01990: 01991: 01992: 01993: 01994: 01995: 01996: 01997: 01998: 01999: 02000: 02001: 02002: 02003: 02004: 02005: 02006: 02007: 02008: 02009: 02010: 02011: 02012: 02013: 02014: 02015: 02016: 02017: 02018: 02019: 02020: 0

Source: International Monetary Fund.

Analysis

Myanmar recorded 0 for financial markets efficiency index in 2020. That is the highest value across all 41 years on record.

Over the whole period, financial markets efficiency index in Myanmar peaked at 0 in 1980 and was at its lowest, 0, in 1980.

That places Myanmar 94th out of 183 countries with data for 2020, putting it in the middle of the range.

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
1980s 0 0 0 10
1990s 0 0 0 10
2000s 0 0 0 10
2010s 0 0 0 10
2020s 0 0 0 1

Countries ranked near Myanmar

  1. 91 Luxembourg 0.0011 compare
  2. 92 Papua New Guinea 0.0007 compare
  3. 93 Rwanda 0 compare
  4. 94 Aruba 0 compare
  5. 94 Angola 0 compare
  6. 94 Albania 0 compare
  7. 94 Armenia 0 compare
  8. 94 Antigua and Barbuda 0 compare
  9. 94 Azerbaijan 0 compare
  10. 94 Burundi 0 compare
  11. 94 Benin 0 compare
  12. 94 Burkina Faso 0 compare
  13. 94 Bahamas 0 compare
  14. 94 Bosnia and Herzegovina 0 compare
  15. 94 Belize 0 compare
  16. 94 Bolivia, Plurinational State of 0 compare
  17. 94 Brunei Darussalam 0 compare
  18. 94 Bhutan 0 compare
  19. 94 Central African Republic 0 compare
  20. 94 Cameroon 0 compare
  21. 94 Congo, Democratic Republic of the 0 compare
  22. 94 Congo 0 compare
  23. 94 Comoros 0 compare
  24. 94 Cape Verde 0 compare
  25. 94 Djibouti 0 compare
  26. 94 Dominica 0 compare
  27. 94 Dominican Republic 0 compare
  28. 94 Algeria 0 compare
  29. 94 Eritrea, The State of 0 compare
  30. 94 Estonia 0 compare
  31. 94 Ethiopia 0 compare
  32. 94 Fiji 0 compare
  33. 94 Micronesia, Federated States of 0 compare
  34. 94 Gabon 0 compare
  35. 94 Georgia 0 compare
  36. 94 Guinea 0 compare
  37. 94 Gambia 0 compare
  38. 94 Guinea-Bissau 0 compare
  39. 94 Equatorial Guinea 0 compare
  40. 94 Grenada 0 compare
  41. 94 Guatemala 0 compare
  42. 94 Guyana 0 compare
  43. 94 Honduras 0 compare
  44. 94 Haiti 0 compare
  45. 94 Iceland 0 compare
  46. 94 Kyrgyzstan 0 compare
  47. 94 Cambodia 0 compare
  48. 94 Kiribati 0 compare
  49. 94 Saint Kitts and Nevis 0 compare
  50. 94 Lao People's Democratic Republic 0 compare
  51. 94 Liberia 0 compare
  52. 94 Libya 0 compare
  53. 94 Saint Lucia 0 compare
  54. 94 Lesotho 0 compare
  55. 94 Lithuania 0 compare
  56. 94 Latvia 0 compare
  57. 94 Macau, China 0 compare
  58. 94 Republic of Moldova 0 compare
  59. 94 Madagascar 0 compare
  60. 94 Maldives 0 compare
  61. 94 Marshall Islands 0 compare
  62. 94 North Macedonia 0 compare
  63. 94 Mali 0 compare
  64. 94 Mongolia 0 compare
  65. 94 Mozambique 0 compare
  66. 94 Mauritania 0 compare
  67. 94 Malawi 0 compare
  68. 94 Niger 0 compare
  69. 94 Nicaragua 0 compare
  70. 94 Nepal 0 compare
  71. 94 French Polynesia 0 compare
  72. 94 Sudan 0 compare
  73. 94 Senegal 0 compare
  74. 94 Solomon Islands 0 compare
  75. 94 Sierra Leone 0 compare
  76. 94 El Salvador 0 compare
  77. 94 South Sudan 0 compare
  78. 94 Sao Tome and Principe 0 compare
  79. 94 Suriname 0 compare
  80. 94 Syrian Arab Republic 0 compare
  81. 94 Chad 0 compare
  82. 94 Togo 0 compare
  83. 94 Tajikistan 0 compare
  84. 94 Turkmenistan 0 compare
  85. 94 Timor-Leste 0 compare
  86. 94 Tonga 0 compare
  87. 94 Uganda 0 compare
  88. 94 Uzbekistan 0 compare
  89. 94 Saint Vincent and the Grenadines 0 compare
  90. 94 Vanuatu 0 compare
  91. 94 Samoa 0 compare
  92. 94 Yemen 0 compare

See the full ranking of 192 places β†’

More financial sector data for Myanmar

All data for Myanmar β†’

Frequently asked questions

What is financial markets efficiency index in Myanmar?
Financial markets efficiency index in Myanmar was 0 in 2020, according to International Monetary Fund.
What is the highest financial markets efficiency index recorded in Myanmar?
The highest recorded value was 0 in 1980.
What is the lowest financial markets efficiency index recorded in Myanmar?
The lowest recorded value was 0 in 1980.
How does Myanmar rank for financial markets efficiency index?
Myanmar ranks 94th out of 183 countries with data for 2020.
Where does this Myanmar data come from?
The figures come from International Monetary Fund, published as part of Financial Markets Efficiency Index. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV Β· JSON β€” 41 observations, free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Financial Markets Efficiency Index in Myanmar. Statizoid, drawing on International Monetary Fund. Retrieved 19 August 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/stat/financial-markets-efficiency-index/myanmar/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/stat/financial-markets-efficiency-index/myanmar/">Financial Markets Efficiency Index in Myanmar</a> β€” Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Financial Markets Efficiency Index
Source
International Monetary Fund
Licence
IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
192 places, 7,872 data points, 1980–2020
Last refreshed

The dataset contains nine indices that summarize how developed financial institutions and financial markets are in terms of their depth, access, and efficiency. These indices are aggregated into an overall index of financial development. With the coverage of over 180 countries on annual frequency from 1980 onwards, the database should offer a useful analytical tool for researchers and policy makers.