Financial Markets Efficiency Index in Uruguay

Uruguay: Financial Markets Efficiency Index was 0.0024 in 2020. β—† Volatile

Latest (2020)
0.0024
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
89th
of 183 countries
All-time high
0.0024
in 1996
All-time low
0.0002
in 1992
Years of data
41
1980–2020

Financial Markets Efficiency Index in Uruguay, 1980–2020

00.0010.0010.0020.0020.0031980200020201980: 01981: 01982: 01983: 01984: 01985: 01986: 01987: 01988: 01989: 01990: 01991: 01992: 01993: 01994: 0.0011995: 0.0011996: 0.0021997: 0.0021998: 0.0021999: 0.0022000: 0.0022001: 0.0022002: 0.0022003: 0.0022004: 0.0022005: 0.0022006: 0.0022007: 0.0022008: 0.0022009: 0.0022010: 0.0022011: 0.0022012: 0.0022013: 0.0022014: 0.0022015: 0.0022016: 0.0022017: 0.0022018: 0.0022019: 0.0022020: 0.002

Source: International Monetary Fund.

Analysis

Uruguay recorded 0.0024 for financial markets efficiency index in 2020. That is the highest value across all 41 years on record.

Compared with earlier readings it is unchanged over ten years.

Over the whole period, financial markets efficiency index in Uruguay peaked at 0.0024 in 1996 and was at its lowest, 0.0002, in 1992.

That places Uruguay 89th out of 183 countries with data for 2020, putting it in the middle of the range.

The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
1980s 0.0003 0.0002 0.0005 10
1990s 0.0012 0.0002 0.0024 10
2000s 0.0024 0.0024 0.0024 10
2010s 0.0024 0.0024 0.0024 10
2020s 0.0024 0.0024 0.0024 1

Countries ranked near Uruguay

  1. 86 Ghana 0.0044 compare
  2. 87 Tanzania 0.0035 compare
  3. 88 Barbados 0.0028 compare
  4. 90 Slovak Republic 0.0024 compare
  5. 91 Luxembourg 0.0011 compare
  6. 92 Papua New Guinea 0.0007 compare

See the full ranking of 192 places β†’

More financial sector data for Uruguay

All data for Uruguay β†’

Frequently asked questions

What is financial markets efficiency index in Uruguay?
Financial markets efficiency index in Uruguay was 0.0024 in 2020, according to International Monetary Fund.
What is the highest financial markets efficiency index recorded in Uruguay?
The highest recorded value was 0.0024 in 1996.
What is the lowest financial markets efficiency index recorded in Uruguay?
The lowest recorded value was 0.0002 in 1992.
How does Uruguay rank for financial markets efficiency index?
Uruguay ranks 89th out of 183 countries with data for 2020.
Is financial markets efficiency index rising or falling in Uruguay?
Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
Where does this Uruguay data come from?
The figures come from International Monetary Fund, published as part of Financial Markets Efficiency Index. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV Β· JSON β€” 41 observations, free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Financial Markets Efficiency Index in Uruguay. Statizoid, drawing on International Monetary Fund. Retrieved 20 August 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/stat/financial-markets-efficiency-index/uruguay/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/stat/financial-markets-efficiency-index/uruguay/">Financial Markets Efficiency Index in Uruguay</a> β€” Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Financial Markets Efficiency Index
Source
International Monetary Fund
Licence
IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
192 places, 7,872 data points, 1980–2020
Last refreshed

The dataset contains nine indices that summarize how developed financial institutions and financial markets are in terms of their depth, access, and efficiency. These indices are aggregated into an overall index of financial development. With the coverage of over 180 countries on annual frequency from 1980 onwards, the database should offer a useful analytical tool for researchers and policy makers.