Liquid liabilities in millions USD (2000 constant) … square in Argentina
Argentina: Liquid liabilities in millions USD (2000 constant) … square was 0.053 2000 constant per square kilometre in 2017. ◆ Volatile
Liquid liabilities in millions USD (2000 constant), per square in Argentina, 1961–2017
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in 2000 constant per square kilometre.
Analysis
The most recent figure for liquid liabilities in millions usd (2000 constant), per square in Argentina is 0.053 2000 constant per square kilometre, measured in 2017. That is the highest value across all 57 years on record.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 8.9% on the previous year and up 73.8% over ten years.
Over the whole period, liquid liabilities in millions usd (2000 constant), per square in Argentina peaked at 0.053 2000 constant per square kilometre in 2017 and was at its lowest, 0.0023 2000 constant per square kilometre, in 1989.
Argentina ranks 134th of 186 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Liquid liabilities in millions USD (2000 constant) … square in Argentina, year by year
| Year | 2000 constant per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 0.009 2000 constant per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 0.0061 2000 constant per square kilometre | -32.5% |
| 1963 | 0.008 2000 constant per square kilometre | +32.6% |
| 1964 | 0.0099 2000 constant per square kilometre | +23.9% |
| 1965 | 0.01 2000 constant per square kilometre | +0.5% |
| 1966 | 0.0099 2000 constant per square kilometre | -1.4% |
| 1967 | 0.0104 2000 constant per square kilometre | +5.8% |
| 1968 | 0.0129 2000 constant per square kilometre | +23.4% |
| 1969 | 0.0148 2000 constant per square kilometre | +15.3% |
| 1970 | 0.0149 2000 constant per square kilometre | +0.2% |
| 1971 | 0.0121 2000 constant per square kilometre | -18.8% |
| 1972 | 0.0245 2000 constant per square kilometre | +102.8% |
| 1973 | 0.0392 2000 constant per square kilometre | +59.9% |
| 1974 | 0.0515 2000 constant per square kilometre | +31.6% |
| 1975 | 0.01 2000 constant per square kilometre | -80.6% |
| 1976 | 0.0097 2000 constant per square kilometre | -2.3% |
| 1977 | 0.0154 2000 constant per square kilometre | +58.2% |
| 1978 | 0.0232 2000 constant per square kilometre | +50.4% |
| 1979 | 0.036 2000 constant per square kilometre | +55.0% |
| 1980 | 0.0502 2000 constant per square kilometre | +39.6% |
| 1981 | 0.0239 2000 constant per square kilometre | -52.4% |
| 1982 | 0.0081 2000 constant per square kilometre | -66.3% |
| 1983 | 0.008 2000 constant per square kilometre | -0.5% |
| 1984 | 0.0075 2000 constant per square kilometre | -6.6% |
| 1985 | 0.0085 2000 constant per square kilometre | +13.8% |
| 1986 | 0.0115 2000 constant per square kilometre | +34.7% |
| 1987 | 0.0097 2000 constant per square kilometre | -15.5% |
| 1988 | 0.0142 2000 constant per square kilometre | +46.0% |
| 1989 | 0.0023 2000 constant per square kilometre | -83.6% |
| 1990 | 0.0085 2000 constant per square kilometre | +266.6% |
| 1991 | 0.0112 2000 constant per square kilometre | +31.1% |
| 1992 | 0.0178 2000 constant per square kilometre | +59.6% |
| 1993 | 0.0252 2000 constant per square kilometre | +41.5% |
| 1994 | 0.0289 2000 constant per square kilometre | +14.5% |
| 1995 | 0.0273 2000 constant per square kilometre | -5.6% |
| 1996 | 0.0314 2000 constant per square kilometre | +15.1% |
| 1997 | 0.0387 2000 constant per square kilometre | +23.3% |
| 1998 | 0.042 2000 constant per square kilometre | +8.7% |
| 1999 | 0.0426 2000 constant per square kilometre | +1.3% |
| 2000 | 0.0418 2000 constant per square kilometre | -1.7% |
| 2001 | 0.0331 2000 constant per square kilometre | -20.8% |
| 2002 | 0.0116 2000 constant per square kilometre | -64.8% |
| 2003 | 0.0169 2000 constant per square kilometre | +45.4% |
| 2004 | 0.0196 2000 constant per square kilometre | +15.5% |
| 2005 | 0.0226 2000 constant per square kilometre | +15.4% |
| 2006 | 0.0262 2000 constant per square kilometre | +16.2% |
| 2007 | 0.0305 2000 constant per square kilometre | +16.3% |
| 2008 | 0.03 2000 constant per square kilometre | -1.7% |
| 2009 | 0.0311 2000 constant per square kilometre | +3.6% |
| 2010 | 0.0389 2000 constant per square kilometre | +25.3% |
| 2011 | 0.044 2000 constant per square kilometre | +13.0% |
| 2012 | 0.051 2000 constant per square kilometre | +15.9% |
| 2013 | 0.0481 2000 constant per square kilometre | -5.7% |
| 2014 | 0.0474 2000 constant per square kilometre | -1.5% |
| 2015 | 0.0426 2000 constant per square kilometre | -10.1% |
| 2016 | 0.0487 2000 constant per square kilometre | +14.3% |
| 2017 | 0.053 2000 constant per square kilometre | +8.9% |
Argentina compared with similar countries
- Argentina's 0.053 2000 constant per square kilometre is below the median for upper middle income countries, which is 0.1924 2000 constant per square kilometre, 28% of the median. (54 countries reporting)
- Argentina's 0.053 2000 constant per square kilometre is below the median for Latin America & Caribbean, which is 0.209 2000 constant per square kilometre, 25% of the median. (33 countries reporting)
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Liquid liabilities in millions USD (2000 constant) … square in Argentina changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1990 | +266.6% | 0.0023 2000 constant per square kilometre | 0.0085 2000 constant per square kilometre |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.0101 2000 constant per square kilometre | 0.0061 2000 constant per square kilometre | 0.0148 2000 constant per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | 0.0236 2000 constant per square kilometre | 0.0097 2000 constant per square kilometre | 0.0515 2000 constant per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 0.0144 2000 constant per square kilometre | 0.0023 2000 constant per square kilometre | 0.0502 2000 constant per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 0.0274 2000 constant per square kilometre | 0.0085 2000 constant per square kilometre | 0.0426 2000 constant per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 0.0264 2000 constant per square kilometre | 0.0116 2000 constant per square kilometre | 0.0418 2000 constant per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 0.0467 2000 constant per square kilometre | 0.0389 2000 constant per square kilometre | 0.053 2000 constant per square kilometre | 8 |
Countries ranked near Argentina
- 131 Kenya 0.0561 2000 constant per square kilometre compare
- 132 Togo 0.0554 2000 constant per square kilometre compare
- 133 Russia 0.0541 2000 constant per square kilometre compare
- 135 Bhutan 0.0523 2000 constant per square kilometre compare
- 136 Senegal 0.0516 2000 constant per square kilometre compare
- 137 Burundi 0.0457 2000 constant per square kilometre compare
More financial sector data for Argentina
- Reserve position in the IMF, US dollar, annual growth rate -100 % change on previous year (2022)
- Reserve position in the IMF, US dollar, per unit of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Reserve position in the IMF, US dollar, per capita 0 units per person (2025)
- Reserve position in the IMF, SDR, annual growth rate -100 % change on previous year (2022)
- Reserve position in the IMF, SDR, per unit of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Reserve position in the IMF, SDR, per capita 0 units per person (2025)
- Reserve tranche position, US dollar, annual growth rate -100 % change on previous year (2022)
- Reserve tranche position, US dollar, per unit of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Reserve tranche position, US dollar, per capita 0 units per person (2025)
- Reserve tranche position, SDR, annual growth rate -100 % change on previous year (2022)
Frequently asked questions
- What is liquid liabilities in millions usd (2000 constant), per square in Argentina?
- Liquid liabilities in millions usd (2000 constant), per square in Argentina was 0.053 2000 constant per square kilometre in 2017, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest liquid liabilities in millions usd (2000 constant), per square recorded in Argentina?
- The highest recorded value was 0.053 2000 constant per square kilometre in 2017.
- What is the lowest liquid liabilities in millions usd (2000 constant), per square recorded in Argentina?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.0023 2000 constant per square kilometre in 1989.
- How does Argentina rank for liquid liabilities in millions usd (2000 constant), per square?
- Argentina ranks 134th out of 186 countries with data for 2017.
- Is liquid liabilities in millions usd (2000 constant), per square rising or falling in Argentina?
- Over the last ten years it is up 73.8%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Argentina data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Liquid liabilities in millions USD (2000 constant), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 57 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Liquid liabilities in millions USD (2000 constant) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Liquid liabilities in millions USD (2000 constant) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Liquid liabilities in millions USD International Financial Statistics (IFS), International Monetary Fund (IMF)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Liquid liabilities in millions USD (2000 constant) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.