Net domestic credit (current LCU), per square kilometre in Canada

Canada: Net domestic credit (current LCU), per square kilometre was 317,708 current LCU per square kilometre in 2008. ◆ Volatile

Latest (2008)
317,708 current LCU per square kilometre
Change on year
up 20.8%
World rank
160th
of 185 countries
All-time high
317,708 current LCU per square kilometre
in 2008
All-time low
1,297 current LCU per square kilometre
in 1961
Years of data
48
1961–2008

Net domestic credit (current LCU), per square kilometre in Canada, 1961–2008

0100.0k200.0k300.0k196119842008

Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current LCU per square kilometre.

Analysis

In 2008, net domestic credit (current lcu), per square kilometre in Canada stood at 317,708 current LCU per square kilometre. That is the highest value across all 48 years on record.

Compared with earlier readings it is up 20.8% on the previous year and up 228.7% over ten years.

Over the whole period, net domestic credit (current lcu), per square kilometre in Canada peaked at 317,708 current LCU per square kilometre in 2008 and was at its lowest, 1,297 current LCU per square kilometre, in 1961.

Canada ranks 160th of 185 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.

The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.

Net domestic credit (current LCU), per square kilometre in Canada, year by year

Annual values for Net domestic credit (current LCU), per square kilometre in Canada, 1961 to 2008.
Year current LCU per square kilometre Change
1961 1,297 current LCU per square kilometre
1962 1,411 current LCU per square kilometre +8.7%
1963 1,495 current LCU per square kilometre +6.0%
1964 1,657 current LCU per square kilometre +10.9%
1965 1,987 current LCU per square kilometre +19.9%
1966 2,773 current LCU per square kilometre +39.6%
1967 3,611 current LCU per square kilometre +30.2%
1968 4,043 current LCU per square kilometre +11.9%
1969 4,355 current LCU per square kilometre +7.7%
1970 4,754 current LCU per square kilometre +9.2%
1971 5,365 current LCU per square kilometre +12.8%
1972 6,303 current LCU per square kilometre +17.5%
1973 7,578 current LCU per square kilometre +20.2%
1974 8,840 current LCU per square kilometre +16.7%
1975 10,244 current LCU per square kilometre +15.9%
1976 12,265 current LCU per square kilometre +19.7%
1977 14,335 current LCU per square kilometre +16.9%
1978 17,123 current LCU per square kilometre +19.5%
1979 20,705 current LCU per square kilometre +20.9%
1980 23,367 current LCU per square kilometre +12.9%
1981 31,759 current LCU per square kilometre +35.9%
1982 32,657 current LCU per square kilometre +2.8%
1983 33,653 current LCU per square kilometre +3.0%
1984 36,530 current LCU per square kilometre +8.5%
1985 39,209 current LCU per square kilometre +7.3%
1986 42,071 current LCU per square kilometre +7.3%
1987 45,860 current LCU per square kilometre +9.0%
1988 51,961 current LCU per square kilometre +13.3%
1989 58,166 current LCU per square kilometre +11.9%
1990 63,029 current LCU per square kilometre +8.4%
1991 67,381 current LCU per square kilometre +6.9%
1992 71,644 current LCU per square kilometre +6.3%
1993 75,197 current LCU per square kilometre +5.0%
1994 79,652 current LCU per square kilometre +5.9%
1995 82,342 current LCU per square kilometre +3.4%
1996 89,294 current LCU per square kilometre +8.4%
1997 95,202 current LCU per square kilometre +6.6%
1998 96,646 current LCU per square kilometre +1.5%
1999 99,665 current LCU per square kilometre +3.1%
2000 106,124 current LCU per square kilometre +6.5%
2001 186,766 current LCU per square kilometre +76.0%
2002 194,238 current LCU per square kilometre +4.0%
2003 197,005 current LCU per square kilometre +1.4%
2004 211,346 current LCU per square kilometre +7.3%
2005 231,945 current LCU per square kilometre +9.7%
2006 266,461 current LCU per square kilometre +14.9%
2007 263,059 current LCU per square kilometre -1.3%
2008 317,708 current LCU per square kilometre +20.8%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
1960s 2,514 current LCU per square kilometre 1,297 current LCU per square kilometre 4,355 current LCU per square kilometre 9
1970s 10,751 current LCU per square kilometre 4,754 current LCU per square kilometre 20,705 current LCU per square kilometre 10
1980s 39,523 current LCU per square kilometre 23,367 current LCU per square kilometre 58,166 current LCU per square kilometre 10
1990s 82,005 current LCU per square kilometre 63,029 current LCU per square kilometre 99,665 current LCU per square kilometre 10
2000s 219,406 current LCU per square kilometre 106,124 current LCU per square kilometre 317,708 current LCU per square kilometre 9

Countries ranked near Canada

  1. 157 Tonga 340,668 current LCU per square kilometre compare
  2. 158 Sierra Leone 333,520 current LCU per square kilometre compare
  3. 159 Peru 327,322 current LCU per square kilometre compare
  4. 161 Bolivia, Plurinational State of 313,908 current LCU per square kilometre compare
  5. 162 Belarus 296,781 current LCU per square kilometre compare
  6. 163 Ecuador 287,305 current LCU per square kilometre compare

See the full ranking of 185 places →

More financial sector data for Canada

All data for Canada →

Frequently asked questions

What is net domestic credit (current lcu), per square kilometre in Canada?
Net domestic credit (current lcu), per square kilometre in Canada was 317,708 current LCU per square kilometre in 2008, according to Statizoid (derived).
What is the highest net domestic credit (current lcu), per square kilometre recorded in Canada?
The highest recorded value was 317,708 current LCU per square kilometre in 2008.
What is the lowest net domestic credit (current lcu), per square kilometre recorded in Canada?
The lowest recorded value was 1,297 current LCU per square kilometre in 1961.
How does Canada rank for net domestic credit (current lcu), per square kilometre?
Canada ranks 160th out of 185 countries with data for 2008.
Is net domestic credit (current lcu), per square kilometre rising or falling in Canada?
Over the last ten years it is up 228.7%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
Where does this Canada data come from?
The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net domestic credit (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 48 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Net domestic credit (current LCU), per square kilometre in Canada. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 27 August 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/stat/net-domestic-credit-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/canada/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/stat/net-domestic-credit-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/canada/">Net domestic credit (current LCU), per square kilometre in Canada</a> — Statizoid

How this figure is calculated

Net domestic credit (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.

Net domestic credit (current LCU) ÷ Land area (sq. km)

Computed from

Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.

About this data

Indicator
Net domestic credit (current LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
current LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
185 places, 8,527 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net domestic credit (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.