Net foreign assets (current LCU), per square kilometre in Tunisia

Tunisia: Net foreign assets (current LCU), per square kilometre was 56,832 current LCU per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile

Latest (2023)
56,832 current LCU per square kilometre
Change on year
up 48.2%
World rank
155th
of 185 countries
All-time high
63,556 current LCU per square kilometre
in 2009
All-time low
-135.25 current LCU per square kilometre
in 1967
Years of data
63
1961–2023

Net foreign assets (current LCU), per square kilometre in Tunisia, 1961–2023

020.0k40.0k60.0k196119922023

Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current LCU per square kilometre.

Analysis

The most recent figure for net foreign assets (current lcu), per square kilometre in Tunisia is 56,832 current LCU per square kilometre, measured in 2023.

Compared with earlier readings it is up 48.2% on the previous year and up 91.8% over ten years.

Over the whole period, net foreign assets (current lcu), per square kilometre in Tunisia peaked at 63,556 current LCU per square kilometre in 2009 and was at its lowest, -135.25 current LCU per square kilometre, in 1967.

That places Tunisia 155th out of 185 countries with data for 2023, putting it in the bottom quarter.

The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.

Net foreign assets (current LCU), per square kilometre in Tunisia, year by year

Annual values for Net foreign assets (current LCU), per square kilometre in Tunisia, 1961 to 2023.
Year current LCU per square kilometre Change
1961 195.03 current LCU per square kilometre —
1962 135.25 current LCU per square kilometre -30.6%
1963 39.05 current LCU per square kilometre -71.1%
1964 -15.02 current LCU per square kilometre -138.5%
1965 -42.96 current LCU per square kilometre +185.9%
1966 -91.53 current LCU per square kilometre +113.1%
1967 -135.25 current LCU per square kilometre +47.8%
1968 -76.05 current LCU per square kilometre -43.8%
1969 -12.93 current LCU per square kilometre -83.0%
1970 32.25 current LCU per square kilometre -349.5%
1971 323.36 current LCU per square kilometre +902.5%
1972 539.13 current LCU per square kilometre +66.7%
1973 763 current LCU per square kilometre +41.5%
1974 962.35 current LCU per square kilometre +26.1%
1975 890.86 current LCU per square kilometre -7.4%
1976 786.28 current LCU per square kilometre -11.7%
1977 601.3 current LCU per square kilometre -23.5%
1978 684.23 current LCU per square kilometre +13.8%
1979 987.6 current LCU per square kilometre +44.3%
1980 1,134 current LCU per square kilometre +14.9%
1981 1,395 current LCU per square kilometre +22.9%
1982 1,494 current LCU per square kilometre +7.1%
1983 2,351 current LCU per square kilometre +57.3%
1984 1,681 current LCU per square kilometre -28.5%
1985 1,111 current LCU per square kilometre -33.9%
1986 90.15 current LCU per square kilometre -91.9%
1987 993.02 current LCU per square kilometre +1001.6%
1988 3,273 current LCU per square kilometre +229.6%
1989 4,107 current LCU per square kilometre +25.5%
1990 3,575 current LCU per square kilometre -13.0%
1991 3,168 current LCU per square kilometre -11.4%
1992 2,985 current LCU per square kilometre -5.8%
1993 3,302 current LCU per square kilometre +10.6%
1994 5,397 current LCU per square kilometre +63.5%
1995 5,132 current LCU per square kilometre -4.9%
1996 7,111 current LCU per square kilometre +38.6%
1997 9,419 current LCU per square kilometre +32.5%
1998 8,207 current LCU per square kilometre -12.9%
1999 11,180 current LCU per square kilometre +36.2%
2000 8,400 current LCU per square kilometre -24.9%
2001 11,226 current LCU per square kilometre +33.6%
2002 11,651 current LCU per square kilometre +3.8%
2003 13,952 current LCU per square kilometre +19.7%
2004 20,016 current LCU per square kilometre +43.5%
2005 25,629 current LCU per square kilometre +28.0%
2006 44,114 current LCU per square kilometre +72.1%
2007 44,272 current LCU per square kilometre +0.4%
2008 52,817 current LCU per square kilometre +19.3%
2009 63,556 current LCU per square kilometre +20.3%
2010 60,609 current LCU per square kilometre -4.6%
2011 39,090 current LCU per square kilometre -35.5%
2012 49,632 current LCU per square kilometre +27.0%
2013 29,637 current LCU per square kilometre -40.3%
2014 28,466 current LCU per square kilometre -4.0%
2015 31,969 current LCU per square kilometre +12.3%
2016 20,404 current LCU per square kilometre -36.2%
2017 15,588 current LCU per square kilometre -23.6%
2018 10,632 current LCU per square kilometre -31.8%
2019 37,446 current LCU per square kilometre +252.2%
2020 48,800 current LCU per square kilometre +30.3%
2021 42,569 current LCU per square kilometre -12.8%
2022 38,349 current LCU per square kilometre -9.9%
2023 56,832 current LCU per square kilometre +48.2%

Tunisia compared with similar countries

  • Tunisia's 56,832 current LCU per square kilometre is below the median for lower middle income countries, which is 1.68 million current LCU per square kilometre, 3% of the median. (46 countries reporting)
  • Tunisia's 56,832 current LCU per square kilometre is below the median for Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan, which is 1.50 million current LCU per square kilometre, 4% of the median. (23 countries reporting)

Biggest year-on-year movements

Years where Net foreign assets (current LCU), per square kilometre in Tunisia changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.

YearChange FromTo
1987 +1001.6% 90.15 current LCU per square kilometre 993.02 current LCU per square kilometre
1971 +902.5% 32.25 current LCU per square kilometre 323.36 current LCU per square kilometre
1970 +349.5% -12.93 current LCU per square kilometre 32.25 current LCU per square kilometre

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
1960s -0.4893 current LCU per square kilometre -135.25 current LCU per square kilometre 195.03 current LCU per square kilometre 9
1970s 657.04 current LCU per square kilometre 32.25 current LCU per square kilometre 987.6 current LCU per square kilometre 10
1980s 1,763 current LCU per square kilometre 90.15 current LCU per square kilometre 4,107 current LCU per square kilometre 10
1990s 5,948 current LCU per square kilometre 2,985 current LCU per square kilometre 11,180 current LCU per square kilometre 10
2000s 29,563 current LCU per square kilometre 8,400 current LCU per square kilometre 63,556 current LCU per square kilometre 10
2010s 32,347 current LCU per square kilometre 10,632 current LCU per square kilometre 60,609 current LCU per square kilometre 10
2020s 46,638 current LCU per square kilometre 38,349 current LCU per square kilometre 56,832 current LCU per square kilometre 4

Countries ranked near Tunisia

  1. 152 El Salvador 70,196 current LCU per square kilometre compare
  2. 153 Belize 69,078 current LCU per square kilometre compare
  3. 154 Ghana 65,446 current LCU per square kilometre compare
  4. 156 Belarus 56,222 current LCU per square kilometre compare
  5. 157 Ecuador 50,023 current LCU per square kilometre compare
  6. 158 Georgia 33,114 current LCU per square kilometre compare

See the full ranking of 185 places →

More financial sector data for Tunisia

All data for Tunisia →

Frequently asked questions

What is net foreign assets (current lcu), per square kilometre in Tunisia?
Net foreign assets (current lcu), per square kilometre in Tunisia was 56,832 current LCU per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
What is the highest net foreign assets (current lcu), per square kilometre recorded in Tunisia?
The highest recorded value was 63,556 current LCU per square kilometre in 2009.
What is the lowest net foreign assets (current lcu), per square kilometre recorded in Tunisia?
The lowest recorded value was -135.25 current LCU per square kilometre in 1967.
How does Tunisia rank for net foreign assets (current lcu), per square kilometre?
Tunisia ranks 155th out of 185 countries with data for 2023.
Is net foreign assets (current lcu), per square kilometre rising or falling in Tunisia?
Over the last ten years it is up 91.8%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
Where does this Tunisia data come from?
The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net foreign assets (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Net foreign assets (current LCU), per square kilometre in Tunisia. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/stat/net-foreign-assets-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/tunisia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/stat/net-foreign-assets-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/tunisia/">Net foreign assets (current LCU), per square kilometre in Tunisia</a> — Statizoid

How this figure is calculated

Net foreign assets (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.

Net foreign assets (current LCU) ÷ Land area (sq. km)

Computed from

Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.

About this data

Indicator
Net foreign assets (current LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
current LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
185 places, 8,583 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net foreign assets (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.