Quasi-Money, Money plus Quasi-Money (Depository Corporations Survey) in Egypt
Egypt: Quasi-Money, Money plus Quasi-Money (Depository Corporations Survey) was 794,995 units per square kilometre in 2008. ◆ Volatile
Quasi-Money, Money plus Quasi-Money (Depository Corporations Survey) in Egypt, 1961–2008
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in units per square kilometre.
Analysis
Egypt recorded 794,995 units per square kilometre for quasi-money, money plus quasi-money (depository corporations survey) in 2008. That is the highest value across all 48 years on record.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 10.5% on the previous year and up 257.5% over ten years.
Over the whole period, quasi-money, money plus quasi-money (depository corporations survey) in Egypt peaked at 794,995 units per square kilometre in 2008 and was at its lowest, 543.88 units per square kilometre, in 1961.
That places Egypt 114th out of 159 countries with data for 2008, putting it in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Quasi-Money, Money plus Quasi-Money (Depository Corporations Survey) in Egypt, year by year
| Year | units per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 543.88 units per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 580.04 units per square kilometre | +6.6% |
| 1963 | 691.95 units per square kilometre | +19.3% |
| 1964 | 804.06 units per square kilometre | +16.2% |
| 1965 | 855.79 units per square kilometre | +6.4% |
| 1966 | 868.95 units per square kilometre | +1.5% |
| 1967 | 920.69 units per square kilometre | +6.0% |
| 1968 | 948.82 units per square kilometre | +3.1% |
| 1969 | 1,003 units per square kilometre | +5.7% |
| 1970 | 1,058 units per square kilometre | +5.4% |
| 1971 | 1,089 units per square kilometre | +3.0% |
| 1972 | 1,261 units per square kilometre | +15.7% |
| 1973 | 1,543 units per square kilometre | +22.4% |
| 1974 | 2,010 units per square kilometre | +30.2% |
| 1975 | 2,441 units per square kilometre | +21.5% |
| 1976 | 3,075 units per square kilometre | +26.0% |
| 1977 | 4,122 units per square kilometre | +34.0% |
| 1978 | 5,236 units per square kilometre | +27.0% |
| 1979 | 6,876 units per square kilometre | +31.3% |
| 1980 | 10,411 units per square kilometre | +51.4% |
| 1981 | 13,628 units per square kilometre | +30.9% |
| 1982 | 17,873 units per square kilometre | +31.2% |
| 1983 | 21,917 units per square kilometre | +22.6% |
| 1984 | 26,048 units per square kilometre | +18.8% |
| 1985 | 30,816 units per square kilometre | +18.3% |
| 1986 | 37,272 units per square kilometre | +21.0% |
| 1987 | 45,084 units per square kilometre | +21.0% |
| 1988 | 54,798 units per square kilometre | +21.5% |
| 1989 | 64,386 units per square kilometre | +17.5% |
| 1990 | 82,885 units per square kilometre | +28.7% |
| 1991 | 98,914 units per square kilometre | +19.3% |
| 1992 | 118,132 units per square kilometre | +19.4% |
| 1993 | 133,783 units per square kilometre | +13.2% |
| 1994 | 148,786 units per square kilometre | +11.2% |
| 1995 | 163,510 units per square kilometre | +9.9% |
| 1996 | 181,229 units per square kilometre | +10.8% |
| 1997 | 200,749 units per square kilometre | +10.8% |
| 1998 | 222,384 units per square kilometre | +10.8% |
| 1999 | 234,978 units per square kilometre | +5.7% |
| 2000 | 262,192 units per square kilometre | +11.6% |
| 2001 | 296,842 units per square kilometre | +13.2% |
| 2002 | 334,333 units per square kilometre | +12.6% |
| 2003 | 405,479 units per square kilometre | +21.3% |
| 2004 | 471,103 units per square kilometre | +16.2% |
| 2005 | 525,247 units per square kilometre | +11.5% |
| 2006 | 604,057 units per square kilometre | +15.0% |
| 2007 | 719,549 units per square kilometre | +19.1% |
| 2008 | 794,995 units per square kilometre | +10.5% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 801.94 units per square kilometre | 543.88 units per square kilometre | 1,003 units per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | 2,871 units per square kilometre | 1,058 units per square kilometre | 6,876 units per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 32,223 units per square kilometre | 10,411 units per square kilometre | 64,386 units per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 158,535 units per square kilometre | 82,885 units per square kilometre | 234,978 units per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 490,422 units per square kilometre | 262,192 units per square kilometre | 794,995 units per square kilometre | 9 |
Countries ranked near Egypt
- 111 Niger 907,784 units per square kilometre compare
- 112 Ukraine 884,704 units per square kilometre compare
- 113 Saudi Arabia 842,066 units per square kilometre compare
- 115 Romania 755,711 units per square kilometre compare
- 116 New Zealand 715,863 units per square kilometre compare
- 117 Liberia 709,072 units per square kilometre compare
More financial sector data for Egypt
- Reserve position in the IMF, US dollar, annual growth rate 5.01 % change on previous year (2025)
- Reserve position in the IMF, US dollar, per unit of GDP 0.001 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Reserve position in the IMF, US dollar, per capita 3.16 units per person (2025)
- Reserve position in the IMF, SDR, annual growth rate 0 % change on previous year (2025)
- Reserve position in the IMF, SDR, per unit of GDP 0.0007 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Reserve position in the IMF, SDR, per capita 2.31 units per person (2025)
- Reserve tranche position, US dollar, annual growth rate 5.01 % change on previous year (2025)
- Reserve tranche position, US dollar, per unit of GDP 0.001 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Reserve tranche position, US dollar, per capita 3.16 units per person (2025)
- Reserve tranche position, SDR, annual growth rate 0 % change on previous year (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is quasi-money, money plus quasi-money (depository corporations survey) in Egypt?
- Quasi-money, money plus quasi-money (depository corporations survey) in Egypt was 794,995 units per square kilometre in 2008, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest quasi-money, money plus quasi-money (depository corporations survey) recorded in Egypt?
- The highest recorded value was 794,995 units per square kilometre in 2008.
- What is the lowest quasi-money, money plus quasi-money (depository corporations survey) recorded in Egypt?
- The lowest recorded value was 543.88 units per square kilometre in 1961.
- How does Egypt rank for quasi-money, money plus quasi-money (depository corporations survey)?
- Egypt ranks 114th out of 159 countries with data for 2008.
- Is quasi-money, money plus quasi-money (depository corporations survey) rising or falling in Egypt?
- Over the last ten years it is up 257.5%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Egypt data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Quasi-Money, Money plus Quasi-Money (Depository Corporations Survey, Domestic currency), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 48 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Quasi-Money, Money plus Quasi-Money (Depository Corporations Survey, Domestic currency) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Quasi-Money, Money plus Quasi-Money (Depository Corporations Survey, Domestic currency) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Quasi-Money, Money plus Quasi-Money International Monetary Fund
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Quasi-Money, Money plus Quasi-Money (Depository Corporations Survey, Domestic currency) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.