Reserve position in the IMF, SDR, per square kilometre in Ecuador
Ecuador: Reserve position in the IMF, SDR, per square kilometre was 114.87 units per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2023)
114.87 units per square kilometre
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
125th
of 189 countries
All-time high
114.87 units per square kilometre
in 2011
All-time low
0 units per square kilometre
in 1961
Years of data
63
1961–2023
Reserve position in the IMF, SDR, per square kilometre in Ecuador, 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in units per square kilometre.
Analysis
Ecuador recorded 114.87 units per square kilometre for reserve position in the imf, sdr, per square kilometre in 2023. That is the highest value across all 63 years on record.
Compared with earlier readings it is unchanged over ten years.
Over the whole period, reserve position in the imf, sdr, per square kilometre in Ecuador peaked at 114.87 units per square kilometre in 2011 and was at its lowest, 0 units per square kilometre, in 1961.
Ecuador ranks 125th of 189 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Reserve position in the IMF, SDR, per square kilometre in Ecuador, year by year
| Year | units per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 0 units per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 0 units per square kilometre | — |
| 1963 | 0 units per square kilometre | — |
| 1964 | 10.84 units per square kilometre | — |
| 1965 | 0 units per square kilometre | -100.0% |
| 1966 | 0 units per square kilometre | — |
| 1967 | 0 units per square kilometre | — |
| 1968 | 1.81 units per square kilometre | — |
| 1969 | 0 units per square kilometre | -100.0% |
| 1970 | 0 units per square kilometre | — |
| 1971 | 0 units per square kilometre | — |
| 1972 | 0 units per square kilometre | — |
| 1973 | 20.23 units per square kilometre | — |
| 1974 | 33.34 units per square kilometre | +64.8% |
| 1975 | 47.79 units per square kilometre | +43.3% |
| 1976 | 0 units per square kilometre | -100.0% |
| 1977 | 0 units per square kilometre | — |
| 1978 | 28.93 units per square kilometre | — |
| 1979 | 33.88 units per square kilometre | +17.1% |
| 1980 | 78.6 units per square kilometre | +132.0% |
| 1981 | 89.44 units per square kilometre | +13.8% |
| 1982 | 0 units per square kilometre | -100.0% |
| 1983 | 41.29 units per square kilometre | — |
| 1984 | 0 units per square kilometre | -100.0% |
| 1985 | 0 units per square kilometre | — |
| 1986 | 0 units per square kilometre | — |
| 1987 | 0 units per square kilometre | — |
| 1988 | 0 units per square kilometre | — |
| 1989 | 0 units per square kilometre | — |
| 1990 | 0 units per square kilometre | — |
| 1991 | 0 units per square kilometre | — |
| 1992 | 61.88 units per square kilometre | — |
| 1993 | 61.86 units per square kilometre | -0.0% |
| 1994 | 61.86 units per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1995 | 61.96 units per square kilometre | +0.2% |
| 1996 | 61.96 units per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1997 | 61.96 units per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1998 | 69.07 units per square kilometre | +11.5% |
| 1999 | 69.07 units per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2000 | 69.07 units per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2001 | 69.07 units per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2002 | 69.07 units per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2003 | 69.07 units per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2004 | 69.07 units per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2005 | 69.07 units per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2006 | 69.07 units per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2007 | 69.07 units per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2008 | 69.07 units per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2009 | 69.07 units per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2010 | 69.07 units per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2011 | 114.87 units per square kilometre | +66.3% |
| 2012 | 114.87 units per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2013 | 114.87 units per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2014 | 114.87 units per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2015 | 114.87 units per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2016 | 114.87 units per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2017 | 114.87 units per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2018 | 114.87 units per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2019 | 114.87 units per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2020 | 114.87 units per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2021 | 114.87 units per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2022 | 114.87 units per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2023 | 114.87 units per square kilometre | +0.0% |
Ecuador compared with similar countries
- Ecuador's 114.87 units per square kilometre is below the median for upper middle income countries, which is 344.31 units per square kilometre, 33% of the median. (58 countries reporting)
- Ecuador's 114.87 units per square kilometre is below the median for Latin America & Caribbean, which is 445.98 units per square kilometre, 26% of the median. (33 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 1.4 units per square kilometre | 0 units per square kilometre | 10.84 units per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | 16.42 units per square kilometre | 0 units per square kilometre | 47.79 units per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 20.93 units per square kilometre | 0 units per square kilometre | 89.44 units per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 50.96 units per square kilometre | 0 units per square kilometre | 69.07 units per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 69.07 units per square kilometre | 69.07 units per square kilometre | 69.07 units per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 110.29 units per square kilometre | 69.07 units per square kilometre | 114.87 units per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 114.87 units per square kilometre | 114.87 units per square kilometre | 114.87 units per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Ecuador
- 122 Bhutan 119.2 units per square kilometre compare
- 123 Paraguay 118.31 units per square kilometre compare
- 124 Antigua and Barbuda 115.98 units per square kilometre compare
- 126 Solomon Islands 112.55 units per square kilometre compare
- 127 Nepal 111.49 units per square kilometre compare
- 128 Guinea 109.27 units per square kilometre compare
More financial sector data for Ecuador
- Reserve position in the IMF, US dollar, annual growth rate 5.01 % change on previous year (2025)
- Reserve position in the IMF, US dollar, per unit of GDP 0.0003 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Reserve position in the IMF, US dollar, per capita 2.14 units per person (2025)
- Reserve position in the IMF, SDR, annual growth rate 0 % change on previous year (2025)
- Reserve position in the IMF, SDR, per unit of GDP 0.0002 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Reserve position in the IMF, SDR, per capita 1.56 units per person (2025)
- Reserve tranche position, US dollar, annual growth rate 5.01 % change on previous year (2025)
- Reserve tranche position, US dollar, per unit of GDP 0.0003 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Reserve tranche position, US dollar, per capita 2.14 units per person (2025)
- Reserve tranche position, SDR, annual growth rate 0 % change on previous year (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is reserve position in the imf, sdr, per square kilometre in Ecuador?
- Reserve position in the imf, sdr, per square kilometre in Ecuador was 114.87 units per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest reserve position in the imf, sdr, per square kilometre recorded in Ecuador?
- The highest recorded value was 114.87 units per square kilometre in 2011.
- What is the lowest reserve position in the imf, sdr, per square kilometre recorded in Ecuador?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 units per square kilometre in 1961.
- How does Ecuador rank for reserve position in the imf, sdr, per square kilometre?
- Ecuador ranks 125th out of 189 countries with data for 2023.
- Is reserve position in the imf, sdr, per square kilometre rising or falling in Ecuador?
- Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Ecuador data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Reserve position in the IMF, SDR, per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Reserve position in the IMF, SDR divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Reserve position in the IMF, SDR ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Reserve position in the IMF, SDR International Monetary Fund
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Reserve position in the IMF, SDR divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.