Reserve position in the IMF, US dollar, per square kilometre in Brazil

Brazil: Reserve position in the IMF, US dollar, per square kilometre was 495.99 units per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile

Latest (2023)
495.99 units per square kilometre
Change on year
down 6.1%
World rank
94th
of 189 countries
All-time high
547.71 units per square kilometre
in 2020
All-time low
0 units per square kilometre
in 1961
Years of data
63
1961–2023

Reserve position in the IMF, US dollar, per square kilometre in Brazil, 1961–2023

0200400600196119922023

Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in units per square kilometre.

Analysis

In 2023, reserve position in the imf, us dollar, per square kilometre in Brazil stood at 495.99 units per square kilometre.

Compared with earlier readings it is down 6.1% on the previous year and up 30.0% over ten years.

Over the whole period, reserve position in the imf, us dollar, per square kilometre in Brazil peaked at 547.71 units per square kilometre in 2020 and was at its lowest, 0 units per square kilometre, in 1961.

Brazil ranks 94th of 189 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.

The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.

Reserve position in the IMF, US dollar, per square kilometre in Brazil, year by year

Annual values for Reserve position in the IMF, US dollar, per square kilometre in Brazil, 1961 to 2023.
Year units per square kilometre Change
1961 0 units per square kilometre
1962 0 units per square kilometre
1963 0 units per square kilometre
1964 0 units per square kilometre
1965 0 units per square kilometre
1966 1.45 units per square kilometre
1967 1.49 units per square kilometre +2.8%
1968 1.48 units per square kilometre -1.0%
1969 1.48 units per square kilometre +0.0%
1970 14.04 units per square kilometre +852.0%
1971 15.11 units per square kilometre +7.6%
1972 15.11 units per square kilometre +0.0%
1973 16.79 units per square kilometre +11.1%
1974 17.04 units per square kilometre +1.5%
1975 16.29 units per square kilometre -4.4%
1976 22.54 units per square kilometre +38.4%
1977 23.28 units per square kilometre +3.3%
1978 21.65 units per square kilometre -7.0%
1979 28.88 units per square kilometre +33.4%
1980 41.13 units per square kilometre +42.4%
1981 31.56 units per square kilometre -23.3%
1982 34.29 units per square kilometre +8.6%
1983 0 units per square kilometre -100.0%
1984 0 units per square kilometre
1985 0 units per square kilometre
1986 0 units per square kilometre
1987 0 units per square kilometre
1988 0 units per square kilometre
1989 0 units per square kilometre
1990 0 units per square kilometre
1991 0 units per square kilometre
1992 0 units per square kilometre
1993 0 units per square kilometre
1994 0 units per square kilometre
1995 0 units per square kilometre
1996 0 units per square kilometre
1997 0 units per square kilometre
1998 0 units per square kilometre
1999 0 units per square kilometre
2000 0 units per square kilometre
2001 0 units per square kilometre
2002 0 units per square kilometre
2003 0 units per square kilometre
2004 0 units per square kilometre
2005 0 units per square kilometre
2006 0 units per square kilometre
2007 0 units per square kilometre
2008 0.0266 units per square kilometre
2009 113.63 units per square kilometre +426682.0%
2010 243.66 units per square kilometre +114.4%
2011 358.13 units per square kilometre +47.0%
2012 416.73 units per square kilometre +16.4%
2013 381.67 units per square kilometre -8.4%
2014 286.69 units per square kilometre -24.9%
2015 205.21 units per square kilometre -28.4%
2016 265.48 units per square kilometre +29.4%
2017 239.16 units per square kilometre -9.9%
2018 280.5 units per square kilometre +17.3%
2019 364.68 units per square kilometre +30.0%
2020 547.71 units per square kilometre +50.2%
2021 535.25 units per square kilometre -2.3%
2022 527.97 units per square kilometre -1.4%
2023 495.99 units per square kilometre -6.1%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
1960s 0.6546 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 1.49 units per square kilometre 9
1970s 19.07 units per square kilometre 14.04 units per square kilometre 28.88 units per square kilometre 10
1980s 10.7 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 41.13 units per square kilometre 10
1990s 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 10
2000s 11.37 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 113.63 units per square kilometre 10
2010s 304.19 units per square kilometre 205.21 units per square kilometre 416.73 units per square kilometre 10
2020s 526.73 units per square kilometre 495.99 units per square kilometre 547.71 units per square kilometre 4

Countries ranked near Brazil

  1. 91 Ghana 545.19 units per square kilometre compare
  2. 92 Burundi 517.26 units per square kilometre compare
  3. 93 Eswatini 511.85 units per square kilometre compare
  4. 95 Togo 484.44 units per square kilometre compare
  5. 96 Latvia 482.65 units per square kilometre compare
  6. 97 Canada 479.55 units per square kilometre compare

See the full ranking of 191 places →

More financial sector data for Brazil

All data for Brazil →

Frequently asked questions

What is reserve position in the imf, us dollar, per square kilometre in Brazil?
Reserve position in the imf, us dollar, per square kilometre in Brazil was 495.99 units per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
What is the highest reserve position in the imf, us dollar, per square kilometre recorded in Brazil?
The highest recorded value was 547.71 units per square kilometre in 2020.
What is the lowest reserve position in the imf, us dollar, per square kilometre recorded in Brazil?
The lowest recorded value was 0 units per square kilometre in 1961.
How does Brazil rank for reserve position in the imf, us dollar, per square kilometre?
Brazil ranks 94th out of 189 countries with data for 2023.
Is reserve position in the imf, us dollar, per square kilometre rising or falling in Brazil?
Over the last ten years it is up 30.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
Where does this Brazil data come from?
The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Reserve position in the IMF, US dollar, per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Reserve position in the IMF, US dollar, per square kilometre in Brazil. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 03 September 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/stat/reserve-position-in-the-imf-us-dollar-per-square-kilometre/brazil/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/stat/reserve-position-in-the-imf-us-dollar-per-square-kilometre/brazil/">Reserve position in the IMF, US dollar, per square kilometre in Brazil</a> — Statizoid

How this figure is calculated

Reserve position in the IMF, US dollar divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.

Reserve position in the IMF, US dollar ÷ Land area (sq. km)

Computed from

Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.

About this data

Indicator
Reserve position in the IMF, US dollar, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
191 places, 10,792 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Reserve position in the IMF, US dollar divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.