Reserve position in the IMF, US dollar, per square kilometre in Finland
Finland: Reserve position in the IMF, US dollar, per square kilometre was 2,838 units per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Reserve position in the IMF, US dollar, per square kilometre in Finland, 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in units per square kilometre.
Analysis
In 2023, reserve position in the imf, us dollar, per square kilometre in Finland stood at 2,838 units per square kilometre.
That represents a change of down 3.7% on the previous year and down 9.2% over ten years.
Over the whole period, reserve position in the imf, us dollar, per square kilometre in Finland peaked at 3,378 units per square kilometre in 2012 and was at its lowest, 0 units per square kilometre, in 1967.
Finland ranks 48th of 189 countries on this measure, in the top quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Reserve position in the IMF, US dollar, per square kilometre in Finland, year by year
| Year | units per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 46.85 units per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 46.85 units per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1963 | 46.85 units per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1964 | 46.88 units per square kilometre | +0.1% |
| 1965 | 46.88 units per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1966 | 102.73 units per square kilometre | +119.1% |
| 1967 | 0 units per square kilometre | -100.0% |
| 1968 | 0.197 units per square kilometre | — |
| 1969 | 135.46 units per square kilometre | +68666.8% |
| 1970 | 219.15 units per square kilometre | +61.8% |
| 1971 | 227.24 units per square kilometre | +3.7% |
| 1972 | 227.24 units per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1973 | 252.53 units per square kilometre | +11.1% |
| 1974 | 256.29 units per square kilometre | +1.5% |
| 1975 | 0 units per square kilometre | -100.0% |
| 1976 | 0 units per square kilometre | — |
| 1977 | 0 units per square kilometre | — |
| 1978 | 197.14 units per square kilometre | — |
| 1979 | 193.15 units per square kilometre | -2.0% |
| 1980 | 324.22 units per square kilometre | +67.9% |
| 1981 | 295.89 units per square kilometre | -8.7% |
| 1982 | 280.64 units per square kilometre | -5.2% |
| 1983 | 422.65 units per square kilometre | +50.6% |
| 1984 | 430.26 units per square kilometre | +1.8% |
| 1985 | 469.75 units per square kilometre | +9.2% |
| 1986 | 542.22 units per square kilometre | +15.4% |
| 1987 | 659.28 units per square kilometre | +21.6% |
| 1988 | 740.64 units per square kilometre | +12.3% |
| 1989 | 771.65 units per square kilometre | +4.2% |
| 1990 | 705.09 units per square kilometre | -8.6% |
| 1991 | 903.18 units per square kilometre | +28.1% |
| 1992 | 1,088 units per square kilometre | +20.4% |
| 1993 | 993.85 units per square kilometre | -8.6% |
| 1994 | 940.01 units per square kilometre | -5.4% |
| 1995 | 1,266 units per square kilometre | +34.7% |
| 1996 | 1,382 units per square kilometre | +9.2% |
| 1997 | 1,835 units per square kilometre | +32.7% |
| 1998 | 2,750 units per square kilometre | +49.9% |
| 1999 | 2,092 units per square kilometre | -23.9% |
| 2000 | 1,633 units per square kilometre | -21.9% |
| 2001 | 1,811 units per square kilometre | +10.9% |
| 2002 | 2,128 units per square kilometre | +17.5% |
| 2003 | 2,547 units per square kilometre | +19.7% |
| 2004 | 2,070 units per square kilometre | -18.7% |
| 2005 | 930.38 units per square kilometre | -55.1% |
| 2006 | 547.44 units per square kilometre | -41.2% |
| 2007 | 430.82 units per square kilometre | -21.3% |
| 2008 | 816.27 units per square kilometre | +89.5% |
| 2009 | 1,393 units per square kilometre | +70.7% |
| 2010 | 1,862 units per square kilometre | +33.6% |
| 2011 | 2,738 units per square kilometre | +47.0% |
| 2012 | 3,378 units per square kilometre | +23.4% |
| 2013 | 3,126 units per square kilometre | -7.5% |
| 2014 | 2,368 units per square kilometre | -24.2% |
| 2015 | 1,641 units per square kilometre | -30.7% |
| 2016 | 2,118 units per square kilometre | +29.1% |
| 2017 | 1,600 units per square kilometre | -24.4% |
| 2018 | 2,014 units per square kilometre | +25.8% |
| 2019 | 2,089 units per square kilometre | +3.8% |
| 2020 | 2,573 units per square kilometre | +23.1% |
| 2021 | 2,885 units per square kilometre | +12.1% |
| 2022 | 2,947 units per square kilometre | +2.2% |
| 2023 | 2,838 units per square kilometre | -3.7% |
Finland compared with similar countries
- Finland's 2,838 units per square kilometre is below the median for high income countries, which is 6,829 units per square kilometre, 42% of the median. (61 countries reporting)
- Finland's 2,838 units per square kilometre is above the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 2,064 units per square kilometre, 1.4× the median. (49 countries reporting)
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Reserve position in the IMF, US dollar, per square kilometre in Finland changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1969 | +68666.8% | 0.197 units per square kilometre | 135.46 units per square kilometre |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 52.52 units per square kilometre | 0 units per square kilometre | 135.46 units per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | 157.27 units per square kilometre | 0 units per square kilometre | 256.29 units per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 493.72 units per square kilometre | 280.64 units per square kilometre | 771.65 units per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 1,396 units per square kilometre | 705.09 units per square kilometre | 2,750 units per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 1,431 units per square kilometre | 430.82 units per square kilometre | 2,547 units per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 2,293 units per square kilometre | 1,600 units per square kilometre | 3,378 units per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 2,811 units per square kilometre | 2,573 units per square kilometre | 2,947 units per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Finland
- 45 Jamaica 3,388 units per square kilometre compare
- 46 Saint Lucia 3,369 units per square kilometre compare
- 47 United States 3,312 units per square kilometre compare
- 49 Marshall Islands 2,613 units per square kilometre compare
- 50 Bahamas 2,585 units per square kilometre compare
- 51 Philippines 2,552 units per square kilometre compare
More financial sector data for Finland
- Reserve position in the IMF, US dollar, annual growth rate 7.97 % change on previous year (2025)
- Reserve position in the IMF, US dollar, per unit of GDP 0.0027 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Reserve position in the IMF, US dollar, per capita 151.59 units per person (2025)
- Reserve position in the IMF, SDR, annual growth rate 2.82 % change on previous year (2025)
- Reserve position in the IMF, SDR, per unit of GDP 0.002 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Reserve position in the IMF, SDR, per capita 110.69 units per person (2025)
- Reserve tranche position, US dollar, annual growth rate 7.97 % change on previous year (2025)
- Reserve tranche position, US dollar, per unit of GDP 0.0027 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Reserve tranche position, US dollar, per capita 151.59 units per person (2025)
- Reserve tranche position, SDR, annual growth rate 2.82 % change on previous year (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is reserve position in the imf, us dollar, per square kilometre in Finland?
- Reserve position in the imf, us dollar, per square kilometre in Finland was 2,838 units per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest reserve position in the imf, us dollar, per square kilometre recorded in Finland?
- The highest recorded value was 3,378 units per square kilometre in 2012.
- What is the lowest reserve position in the imf, us dollar, per square kilometre recorded in Finland?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 units per square kilometre in 1967.
- How does Finland rank for reserve position in the imf, us dollar, per square kilometre?
- Finland ranks 48th out of 189 countries with data for 2023.
- Is reserve position in the imf, us dollar, per square kilometre rising or falling in Finland?
- Over the last ten years it is down 9.2%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Finland data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Reserve position in the IMF, US dollar, per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Reserve position in the IMF, US dollar divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Reserve position in the IMF, US dollar ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Reserve position in the IMF, US dollar International Monetary Fund
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Reserve position in the IMF, US dollar divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.