Reserve position in the IMF, US dollar, per square kilometre in Suriname

Suriname: Reserve position in the IMF, US dollar, per square kilometre was 16.3 units per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile

Latest (2023)
16.3 units per square kilometre
Change on year
up 0.8%
World rank
148th
of 189 countries
All-time high
81.63 units per square kilometre
in 2017
All-time low
0 units per square kilometre
in 1961
Years of data
63
1961–2023

Reserve position in the IMF, US dollar, per square kilometre in Suriname, 1961–2023

020406080196119922023

Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in units per square kilometre.

Analysis

Suriname recorded 16.3 units per square kilometre for reserve position in the imf, us dollar, per square kilometre in 2023.

That represents a change of up 0.8% on the previous year and down 72.3% over ten years.

Over the whole period, reserve position in the imf, us dollar, per square kilometre in Suriname peaked at 81.63 units per square kilometre in 2017 and was at its lowest, 0 units per square kilometre, in 1961.

That places Suriname 148th out of 189 countries with data for 2023, putting it in the bottom quarter.

The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.

Reserve position in the IMF, US dollar, per square kilometre in Suriname, year by year

Annual values for Reserve position in the IMF, US dollar, per square kilometre in Suriname, 1961 to 2023.
Year units per square kilometre Change
1961 0 units per square kilometre
1962 0 units per square kilometre
1963 0 units per square kilometre
1964 0 units per square kilometre
1965 0 units per square kilometre
1966 0 units per square kilometre
1967 0 units per square kilometre
1968 0 units per square kilometre
1969 0 units per square kilometre
1970 0 units per square kilometre
1971 0 units per square kilometre
1972 0 units per square kilometre
1973 0 units per square kilometre
1974 0 units per square kilometre
1975 0 units per square kilometre
1976 0 units per square kilometre
1977 0 units per square kilometre
1978 38.55 units per square kilometre
1979 38.98 units per square kilometre +1.1%
1980 62.54 units per square kilometre +60.4%
1981 57.07 units per square kilometre -8.7%
1982 54.16 units per square kilometre -5.1%
1983 19.24 units per square kilometre -64.5%
1984 0 units per square kilometre -100.0%
1985 0 units per square kilometre
1986 0 units per square kilometre
1987 0 units per square kilometre
1988 0 units per square kilometre
1989 0 units per square kilometre
1990 0 units per square kilometre
1991 0 units per square kilometre
1992 0 units per square kilometre
1993 0 units per square kilometre
1994 0 units per square kilometre
1995 0 units per square kilometre
1996 0 units per square kilometre
1997 0 units per square kilometre
1998 0 units per square kilometre
1999 52.38 units per square kilometre
2000 49.72 units per square kilometre -5.1%
2001 47.96 units per square kilometre -3.5%
2002 51.88 units per square kilometre +8.2%
2003 56.7 units per square kilometre +9.3%
2004 59.26 units per square kilometre +4.5%
2005 54.54 units per square kilometre -8.0%
2006 57.41 units per square kilometre +5.3%
2007 60.3 units per square kilometre +5.0%
2008 58.78 units per square kilometre -2.5%
2009 59.82 units per square kilometre +1.8%
2010 58.77 units per square kilometre -1.8%
2011 58.59 units per square kilometre -0.3%
2012 58.65 units per square kilometre +0.1%
2013 58.77 units per square kilometre +0.2%
2014 55.29 units per square kilometre -5.9%
2015 0 units per square kilometre -100.0%
2016 77.05 units per square kilometre
2017 81.63 units per square kilometre +5.9%
2018 79.72 units per square kilometre -2.3%
2019 79.26 units per square kilometre -0.6%
2020 17.5 units per square kilometre -77.9%
2021 17 units per square kilometre -2.8%
2022 16.17 units per square kilometre -4.9%
2023 16.3 units per square kilometre +0.8%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
1960s 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 9
1970s 7.75 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 38.98 units per square kilometre 10
1980s 19.3 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 62.54 units per square kilometre 10
1990s 5.24 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 52.38 units per square kilometre 10
2000s 55.64 units per square kilometre 47.96 units per square kilometre 60.3 units per square kilometre 10
2010s 60.77 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 81.63 units per square kilometre 10
2020s 16.74 units per square kilometre 16.17 units per square kilometre 17.5 units per square kilometre 4

Countries ranked near Suriname

  1. 145 Niger 26.73 units per square kilometre compare
  2. 146 Mauritania 21.18 units per square kilometre compare
  3. 147 Jordan 17.63 units per square kilometre compare
  4. 149 Dominica 16.18 units per square kilometre compare
  5. 150 Croatia 10.08 units per square kilometre compare
  6. 151 Bosnia and Herzegovina 9.54 units per square kilometre compare

See the full ranking of 191 places →

More financial sector data for Suriname

All data for Suriname →

Frequently asked questions

What is reserve position in the imf, us dollar, per square kilometre in Suriname?
Reserve position in the imf, us dollar, per square kilometre in Suriname was 16.3 units per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
What is the highest reserve position in the imf, us dollar, per square kilometre recorded in Suriname?
The highest recorded value was 81.63 units per square kilometre in 2017.
What is the lowest reserve position in the imf, us dollar, per square kilometre recorded in Suriname?
The lowest recorded value was 0 units per square kilometre in 1961.
How does Suriname rank for reserve position in the imf, us dollar, per square kilometre?
Suriname ranks 148th out of 189 countries with data for 2023.
Is reserve position in the imf, us dollar, per square kilometre rising or falling in Suriname?
Over the last ten years it is down 72.3%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
Where does this Suriname data come from?
The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Reserve position in the IMF, US dollar, per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Reserve position in the IMF, US dollar, per square kilometre in Suriname. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 03 September 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/stat/reserve-position-in-the-imf-us-dollar-per-square-kilometre/suriname/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/stat/reserve-position-in-the-imf-us-dollar-per-square-kilometre/suriname/">Reserve position in the IMF, US dollar, per square kilometre in Suriname</a> — Statizoid

How this figure is calculated

Reserve position in the IMF, US dollar divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.

Reserve position in the IMF, US dollar ÷ Land area (sq. km)

Computed from

Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.

About this data

Indicator
Reserve position in the IMF, US dollar, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
191 places, 10,792 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Reserve position in the IMF, US dollar divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.