Reserve position in the IMF, US dollar, per square kilometre in Timor-Leste

Timor-Leste: Reserve position in the IMF, US dollar, per square kilometre was 392.58 units per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile

Latest (2023)
392.58 units per square kilometre
Change on year
up 0.8%
World rank
103rd
of 189 countries
All-time high
421.43 units per square kilometre
in 2020
All-time low
0 units per square kilometre
in 1961
Years of data
63
1961–2023

Reserve position in the IMF, US dollar, per square kilometre in Timor-Leste, 1961–2023

0100200300400196119922023

Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in units per square kilometre.

Analysis

In 2023, reserve position in the imf, us dollar, per square kilometre in Timor-Leste stood at 392.58 units per square kilometre.

That represents a change of up 0.8% on the previous year and up 378,965.0% over ten years.

Over the whole period, reserve position in the imf, us dollar, per square kilometre in Timor-Leste peaked at 421.43 units per square kilometre in 2020 and was at its lowest, 0 units per square kilometre, in 1961.

That places Timor-Leste 103rd out of 189 countries with data for 2023, putting it in the middle of the range.

The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.

Reserve position in the IMF, US dollar, per square kilometre in Timor-Leste, year by year

Annual values for Reserve position in the IMF, US dollar, per square kilometre in Timor-Leste, 1961 to 2023.
Year units per square kilometre Change
1961 0 units per square kilometre
1962 0 units per square kilometre
1963 0 units per square kilometre
1964 0 units per square kilometre
1965 0 units per square kilometre
1966 0 units per square kilometre
1967 0 units per square kilometre
1968 0 units per square kilometre
1969 0 units per square kilometre
1970 0 units per square kilometre
1971 0 units per square kilometre
1972 0 units per square kilometre
1973 0 units per square kilometre
1974 0 units per square kilometre
1975 0 units per square kilometre
1976 0 units per square kilometre
1977 0 units per square kilometre
1978 0 units per square kilometre
1979 0 units per square kilometre
1980 0 units per square kilometre
1981 0 units per square kilometre
1982 0 units per square kilometre
1983 0 units per square kilometre
1984 0 units per square kilometre
1985 0 units per square kilometre
1986 0 units per square kilometre
1987 0 units per square kilometre
1988 0 units per square kilometre
1989 0 units per square kilometre
1990 0 units per square kilometre
1991 0 units per square kilometre
1992 0 units per square kilometre
1993 0 units per square kilometre
1994 0 units per square kilometre
1995 0 units per square kilometre
1996 0 units per square kilometre
1997 0 units per square kilometre
1998 0 units per square kilometre
1999 0 units per square kilometre
2000 0 units per square kilometre
2001 0 units per square kilometre
2002 0.0914 units per square kilometre
2003 0.0999 units per square kilometre +9.3%
2004 0.1044 units per square kilometre +4.5%
2005 0.0961 units per square kilometre -8.0%
2006 0.1012 units per square kilometre +5.3%
2007 0.1063 units per square kilometre +5.0%
2008 0.1036 units per square kilometre -2.5%
2009 0.1054 units per square kilometre +1.8%
2010 0.1036 units per square kilometre -1.8%
2011 0.1032 units per square kilometre -0.3%
2012 0.1034 units per square kilometre +0.1%
2013 0.1036 units per square kilometre +0.2%
2014 63.43 units per square kilometre +61145.0%
2015 60.67 units per square kilometre -4.4%
2016 393.36 units per square kilometre +548.4%
2017 416.7 units per square kilometre +5.9%
2018 406.95 units per square kilometre -2.3%
2019 404.62 units per square kilometre -0.6%
2020 421.43 units per square kilometre +4.2%
2021 409.52 units per square kilometre -2.8%
2022 389.41 units per square kilometre -4.9%
2023 392.58 units per square kilometre +0.8%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
1960s 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 9
1970s 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 10
1980s 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 10
1990s 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 10
2000s 0.0808 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0.1063 units per square kilometre 10
2010s 174.61 units per square kilometre 0.1032 units per square kilometre 416.7 units per square kilometre 10
2020s 403.23 units per square kilometre 389.41 units per square kilometre 421.43 units per square kilometre 4

Countries ranked near Timor-Leste

  1. 100 Morocco 451.19 units per square kilometre compare
  2. 101 Liberia 450.35 units per square kilometre compare
  3. 102 Iran, Islamic Republic of 427.92 units per square kilometre compare
  4. 104 Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of 387.58 units per square kilometre compare
  5. 105 Peru 386.5 units per square kilometre compare
  6. 106 Egypt 368.42 units per square kilometre compare

See the full ranking of 191 places →

More financial sector data for Timor-Leste

All data for Timor-Leste →

Frequently asked questions

What is reserve position in the imf, us dollar, per square kilometre in Timor-Leste?
Reserve position in the imf, us dollar, per square kilometre in Timor-Leste was 392.58 units per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
What is the highest reserve position in the imf, us dollar, per square kilometre recorded in Timor-Leste?
The highest recorded value was 421.43 units per square kilometre in 2020.
What is the lowest reserve position in the imf, us dollar, per square kilometre recorded in Timor-Leste?
The lowest recorded value was 0 units per square kilometre in 1961.
How does Timor-Leste rank for reserve position in the imf, us dollar, per square kilometre?
Timor-Leste ranks 103rd out of 189 countries with data for 2023.
Is reserve position in the imf, us dollar, per square kilometre rising or falling in Timor-Leste?
Over the last ten years it is up 378,965.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
Where does this Timor-Leste data come from?
The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Reserve position in the IMF, US dollar, per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Reserve position in the IMF, US dollar, per square kilometre in Timor-Leste. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 03 September 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/stat/reserve-position-in-the-imf-us-dollar-per-square-kilometre/timor-leste/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/stat/reserve-position-in-the-imf-us-dollar-per-square-kilometre/timor-leste/">Reserve position in the IMF, US dollar, per square kilometre in Timor-Leste</a> — Statizoid

How this figure is calculated

Reserve position in the IMF, US dollar divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.

Reserve position in the IMF, US dollar ÷ Land area (sq. km)

Computed from

Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.

About this data

Indicator
Reserve position in the IMF, US dollar, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
191 places, 10,792 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Reserve position in the IMF, US dollar divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.