Reserve tranche position, SDR, per square kilometre in Costa Rica

Costa Rica: Reserve tranche position, SDR, per square kilometre was 1,397 units per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile

Latest (2023)
1,397 units per square kilometre
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
57th
of 189 countries
All-time high
1,397 units per square kilometre
in 2016
All-time low
0 units per square kilometre
in 1961
Years of data
63
1961–2023

Reserve tranche position, SDR, per square kilometre in Costa Rica, 1961–2023

05001.0k1.5k196119922023

Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in units per square kilometre.

Analysis

The most recent figure for reserve tranche position, sdr, per square kilometre in Costa Rica is 1,397 units per square kilometre, measured in 2023. That is the highest value across all 63 years on record.

The figure is up 256.4% over ten years.

Over the whole period, reserve tranche position, sdr, per square kilometre in Costa Rica peaked at 1,397 units per square kilometre in 2016 and was at its lowest, 0 units per square kilometre, in 1961.

That places Costa Rica 57th out of 189 countries with data for 2023, putting it in the middle of the range.

The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.

Reserve tranche position, SDR, per square kilometre in Costa Rica, year by year

Annual values for Reserve tranche position, SDR, per square kilometre in Costa Rica, 1961 to 2023.
Year units per square kilometre Change
1961 0 units per square kilometre
1962 7.83 units per square kilometre
1963 0 units per square kilometre -100.0%
1964 0 units per square kilometre
1965 0 units per square kilometre
1966 0 units per square kilometre
1967 0 units per square kilometre
1968 0 units per square kilometre
1969 39.56 units per square kilometre
1970 118.1 units per square kilometre +198.5%
1971 5.68 units per square kilometre -95.2%
1972 5.48 units per square kilometre -3.4%
1973 5.48 units per square kilometre +0.0%
1974 0 units per square kilometre -100.0%
1975 0 units per square kilometre
1976 0 units per square kilometre
1977 0 units per square kilometre
1978 152.37 units per square kilometre
1979 147.67 units per square kilometre -3.1%
1980 0 units per square kilometre -100.0%
1981 0 units per square kilometre
1982 0 units per square kilometre
1983 0 units per square kilometre
1984 0 units per square kilometre
1985 0 units per square kilometre
1986 0 units per square kilometre
1987 0 units per square kilometre
1988 0 units per square kilometre
1989 0 units per square kilometre
1990 0 units per square kilometre
1991 0 units per square kilometre
1992 170.97 units per square kilometre
1993 170.88 units per square kilometre -0.1%
1994 170.88 units per square kilometre +0.0%
1995 170.88 units per square kilometre +0.0%
1996 170.88 units per square kilometre +0.0%
1997 170.88 units per square kilometre +0.0%
1998 170.88 units per square kilometre +0.0%
1999 391.7 units per square kilometre +129.2%
2000 391.7 units per square kilometre +0.0%
2001 391.7 units per square kilometre +0.0%
2002 391.7 units per square kilometre +0.0%
2003 391.7 units per square kilometre +0.0%
2004 391.7 units per square kilometre +0.0%
2005 391.7 units per square kilometre +0.0%
2006 391.7 units per square kilometre +0.0%
2007 391.7 units per square kilometre +0.0%
2008 392.07 units per square kilometre +0.1%
2009 392.07 units per square kilometre +0.0%
2010 392.07 units per square kilometre +0.0%
2011 392.07 units per square kilometre +0.0%
2012 392.07 units per square kilometre +0.0%
2013 392.07 units per square kilometre +0.0%
2014 392.07 units per square kilometre +0.0%
2015 392.07 units per square kilometre +0.0%
2016 1,397 units per square kilometre +256.4%
2017 1,397 units per square kilometre +0.0%
2018 1,397 units per square kilometre +0.0%
2019 1,397 units per square kilometre +0.0%
2020 1,397 units per square kilometre +0.0%
2021 1,397 units per square kilometre +0.0%
2022 1,397 units per square kilometre +0.0%
2023 1,397 units per square kilometre +0.0%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
1960s 5.27 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 39.56 units per square kilometre 9
1970s 43.48 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 152.37 units per square kilometre 10
1980s 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 10
1990s 158.79 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 391.7 units per square kilometre 10
2000s 391.77 units per square kilometre 391.7 units per square kilometre 392.07 units per square kilometre 10
2010s 794.14 units per square kilometre 392.07 units per square kilometre 1,397 units per square kilometre 10
2020s 1,397 units per square kilometre 1,397 units per square kilometre 1,397 units per square kilometre 4

Countries ranked near Costa Rica

  1. 54 Kiribati 1,739 units per square kilometre compare
  2. 55 Comoros 1,702 units per square kilometre compare
  3. 56 Estonia 1,538 units per square kilometre compare
  4. 58 Fiji 1,357 units per square kilometre compare
  5. 59 Dominican Republic 1,341 units per square kilometre compare
  6. 60 New Zealand 1,330 units per square kilometre compare

See the full ranking of 191 places →

More financial sector data for Costa Rica

All data for Costa Rica →

Frequently asked questions

What is reserve tranche position, sdr, per square kilometre in Costa Rica?
Reserve tranche position, sdr, per square kilometre in Costa Rica was 1,397 units per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
What is the highest reserve tranche position, sdr, per square kilometre recorded in Costa Rica?
The highest recorded value was 1,397 units per square kilometre in 2016.
What is the lowest reserve tranche position, sdr, per square kilometre recorded in Costa Rica?
The lowest recorded value was 0 units per square kilometre in 1961.
How does Costa Rica rank for reserve tranche position, sdr, per square kilometre?
Costa Rica ranks 57th out of 189 countries with data for 2023.
Is reserve tranche position, sdr, per square kilometre rising or falling in Costa Rica?
Over the last ten years it is up 256.4%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
Where does this Costa Rica data come from?
The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Reserve tranche position, SDR, per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Reserve tranche position, SDR, per square kilometre in Costa Rica. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 02 September 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/stat/reserve-tranche-position-sdr-per-square-kilometre/costa-rica/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/stat/reserve-tranche-position-sdr-per-square-kilometre/costa-rica/">Reserve tranche position, SDR, per square kilometre in Costa Rica</a> — Statizoid

How this figure is calculated

Reserve tranche position, SDR divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.

Reserve tranche position, SDR ÷ Land area (sq. km)

Computed from

Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.

About this data

Indicator
Reserve tranche position, SDR, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
191 places, 10,792 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Reserve tranche position, SDR divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.