Reserve tranche position, SDR, per square kilometre in East Timor
East Timor: Reserve tranche position, SDR, per square kilometre was 292.6 units per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2023)
292.6 units per square kilometre
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
103rd
of 189 countries
All-time high
292.6 units per square kilometre
in 2016
All-time low
0 units per square kilometre
in 1961
Years of data
63
1961–2023
Reserve tranche position, SDR, per square kilometre in East Timor, 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in units per square kilometre.
Analysis
The most recent figure for reserve tranche position, sdr, per square kilometre in East Timor is 292.6 units per square kilometre, measured in 2023. That is the highest value across all 63 years on record.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 435,000.0% over ten years.
Over the whole period, reserve tranche position, sdr, per square kilometre in East Timor peaked at 292.6 units per square kilometre in 2016 and was at its lowest, 0 units per square kilometre, in 1961.
That places East Timor 103rd out of 189 countries with data for 2023, putting it in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Reserve tranche position, SDR, per square kilometre in East Timor, year by year
| Year | units per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 0 units per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 0 units per square kilometre | — |
| 1963 | 0 units per square kilometre | — |
| 1964 | 0 units per square kilometre | — |
| 1965 | 0 units per square kilometre | — |
| 1966 | 0 units per square kilometre | — |
| 1967 | 0 units per square kilometre | — |
| 1968 | 0 units per square kilometre | — |
| 1969 | 0 units per square kilometre | — |
| 1970 | 0 units per square kilometre | — |
| 1971 | 0 units per square kilometre | — |
| 1972 | 0 units per square kilometre | — |
| 1973 | 0 units per square kilometre | — |
| 1974 | 0 units per square kilometre | — |
| 1975 | 0 units per square kilometre | — |
| 1976 | 0 units per square kilometre | — |
| 1977 | 0 units per square kilometre | — |
| 1978 | 0 units per square kilometre | — |
| 1979 | 0 units per square kilometre | — |
| 1980 | 0 units per square kilometre | — |
| 1981 | 0 units per square kilometre | — |
| 1982 | 0 units per square kilometre | — |
| 1983 | 0 units per square kilometre | — |
| 1984 | 0 units per square kilometre | — |
| 1985 | 0 units per square kilometre | — |
| 1986 | 0 units per square kilometre | — |
| 1987 | 0 units per square kilometre | — |
| 1988 | 0 units per square kilometre | — |
| 1989 | 0 units per square kilometre | — |
| 1990 | 0 units per square kilometre | — |
| 1991 | 0 units per square kilometre | — |
| 1992 | 0 units per square kilometre | — |
| 1993 | 0 units per square kilometre | — |
| 1994 | 0 units per square kilometre | — |
| 1995 | 0 units per square kilometre | — |
| 1996 | 0 units per square kilometre | — |
| 1997 | 0 units per square kilometre | — |
| 1998 | 0 units per square kilometre | — |
| 1999 | 0 units per square kilometre | — |
| 2000 | 0 units per square kilometre | — |
| 2001 | 0 units per square kilometre | — |
| 2002 | 0.0672 units per square kilometre | — |
| 2003 | 0.0672 units per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2004 | 0.0672 units per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2005 | 0.0672 units per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2006 | 0.0672 units per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2007 | 0.0672 units per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2008 | 0.0672 units per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2009 | 0.0672 units per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2010 | 0.0672 units per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2011 | 0.0672 units per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2012 | 0.0672 units per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2013 | 0.0672 units per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2014 | 43.78 units per square kilometre | +65000.0% |
| 2015 | 43.78 units per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2016 | 292.6 units per square kilometre | +568.4% |
| 2017 | 292.6 units per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2018 | 292.6 units per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2019 | 292.6 units per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2020 | 292.6 units per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2021 | 292.6 units per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2022 | 292.6 units per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2023 | 292.6 units per square kilometre | +0.0% |
East Timor compared with similar countries
- East Timor's 292.6 units per square kilometre is above the median for lower middle income countries, which is 143.15 units per square kilometre, 2.0× the median. (46 countries reporting)
- East Timor's 292.6 units per square kilometre is below the median for East Asia & Pacific, which is 980.42 units per square kilometre, 30% of the median. (29 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0 units per square kilometre | 0 units per square kilometre | 0 units per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | 0 units per square kilometre | 0 units per square kilometre | 0 units per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 0 units per square kilometre | 0 units per square kilometre | 0 units per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 0 units per square kilometre | 0 units per square kilometre | 0 units per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 0.0538 units per square kilometre | 0 units per square kilometre | 0.0672 units per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 125.82 units per square kilometre | 0.0672 units per square kilometre | 292.6 units per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 292.6 units per square kilometre | 292.6 units per square kilometre | 292.6 units per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near East Timor
- 100 Morocco 336.29 units per square kilometre compare
- 101 Liberia 335.66 units per square kilometre compare
- 102 Iran 318.94 units per square kilometre compare
- 104 Venezuela 288.88 units per square kilometre compare
- 105 Peru 288.07 units per square kilometre compare
- 106 Egypt 274.6 units per square kilometre compare
More financial sector data for East Timor
- Reserve position in the IMF, US dollar, annual growth rate 5.01 % change on previous year (2025)
- Reserve position in the IMF, US dollar, per unit of GDP 0.0031 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Reserve position in the IMF, US dollar, per capita 4.2 units per person (2025)
- Reserve position in the IMF, SDR, annual growth rate 0 % change on previous year (2025)
- Reserve position in the IMF, SDR, per unit of GDP 0.0023 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Reserve position in the IMF, SDR, per capita 3.07 units per person (2025)
- Reserve tranche position, US dollar, annual growth rate 5.01 % change on previous year (2025)
- Reserve tranche position, US dollar, per unit of GDP 0.0031 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Reserve tranche position, US dollar, per capita 4.2 units per person (2025)
- Reserve tranche position, SDR, annual growth rate 0 % change on previous year (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is reserve tranche position, sdr, per square kilometre in East Timor?
- Reserve tranche position, sdr, per square kilometre in East Timor was 292.6 units per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest reserve tranche position, sdr, per square kilometre recorded in East Timor?
- The highest recorded value was 292.6 units per square kilometre in 2016.
- What is the lowest reserve tranche position, sdr, per square kilometre recorded in East Timor?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 units per square kilometre in 1961.
- How does East Timor rank for reserve tranche position, sdr, per square kilometre?
- East Timor ranks 103rd out of 189 countries with data for 2023.
- Is reserve tranche position, sdr, per square kilometre rising or falling in East Timor?
- Over the last ten years it is up 435,000.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this East Timor data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Reserve tranche position, SDR, per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Reserve tranche position, SDR divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Reserve tranche position, SDR ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Reserve tranche position, SDR International Monetary Fund
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Reserve tranche position, SDR divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.