Use of IMF Credit and Loans, SDR in India
India: Use of IMF Credit and Loans, SDR was 0 in 2025. ◆ Volatile
Use of IMF Credit and Loans, SDR in India, 1945–2025
Source: International Monetary Fund.
Analysis
The most recent figure for use of imf credit and loans, sdr in India is 0, measured in 2025. That is the lowest value across all 81 years on record.
Over the whole period, use of imf credit and loans, sdr in India peaked at 4.53 billion in 1984 and was at its lowest, 0, in 1945.
That places India 87th out of 194 countries with data for 2025, putting it in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Use of IMF Credit and Loans, SDR in India, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1945 | 0 | — |
| 1946 | 0 | — |
| 1947 | 0 | — |
| 1948 | 40.77 million | — |
| 1949 | 72.44 million | +77.7% |
| 1950 | 72.43 million | -0.0% |
| 1951 | 72.42 million | -0.0% |
| 1952 | 72.42 million | +0.0% |
| 1953 | 72.41 million | -0.0% |
| 1954 | 25.68 million | -64.5% |
| 1955 | 0 | -100.0% |
| 1956 | 0 | — |
| 1957 | 172.57 million | — |
| 1958 | 177.06 million | +2.6% |
| 1959 | 131.78 million | -25.6% |
| 1960 | 62.67 million | -52.4% |
| 1961 | 188.32 million | +200.5% |
| 1962 | 217.42 million | +15.5% |
| 1963 | 197.75 million | -9.0% |
| 1964 | 153.72 million | -22.3% |
| 1965 | 286.96 million | +86.7% |
| 1966 | 360.93 million | +25.8% |
| 1967 | 456.27 million | +26.4% |
| 1968 | 373.57 million | -18.1% |
| 1969 | 240.43 million | -35.6% |
| 1970 | 10.00 million | -95.8% |
| 1971 | 0 | -100.0% |
| 1972 | 0 | — |
| 1973 | 0 | — |
| 1974 | 496.99 million | — |
| 1975 | 698.32 million | +40.5% |
| 1976 | 406.32 million | -41.8% |
| 1977 | 125.10 million | -69.2% |
| 1978 | 0 | -100.0% |
| 1979 | 0 | — |
| 1980 | 791.46 million | — |
| 1981 | 1.10 billion | +38.4% |
| 1982 | 2.60 billion | +137.0% |
| 1983 | 4.06 billion | +56.5% |
| 1984 | 4.53 billion | +11.5% |
| 1985 | 4.35 billion | -3.9% |
| 1986 | 3.92 billion | -10.0% |
| 1987 | 3.18 billion | -19.0% |
| 1988 | 2.28 billion | -28.1% |
| 1989 | 1.44 billion | -36.9% |
| 1990 | 803.55 million | -44.2% |
| 1991 | 2.43 billion | +202.0% |
| 1992 | 3.26 billion | +34.4% |
| 1993 | 3.58 billion | +10.0% |
| 1994 | 2.76 billion | -22.9% |
| 1995 | 1.97 billion | -28.8% |
| 1996 | 1.09 billion | -44.8% |
| 1997 | 589.79 million | -45.7% |
| 1998 | 284.92 million | -51.7% |
| 1999 | 38.50 million | -86.5% |
| 2000 | 0 | -100.0% |
| 2001 | 0 | — |
| 2002 | 0 | — |
| 2003 | 0 | — |
| 2004 | 0 | — |
| 2005 | 0 | — |
| 2006 | 0 | — |
| 2007 | 0 | — |
| 2008 | 0 | — |
| 2009 | 0 | — |
| 2010 | 0 | — |
| 2011 | 0 | — |
| 2012 | 0 | — |
| 2013 | 0 | — |
| 2014 | 0 | — |
| 2015 | 0 | — |
| 2016 | 0 | — |
| 2017 | 0 | — |
| 2018 | 0 | — |
| 2019 | 0 | — |
| 2020 | 0 | — |
| 2021 | 0 | — |
| 2022 | 0 | — |
| 2023 | 0 | — |
| 2024 | 0 | — |
| 2025 | 0 | — |
India compared with similar countries
- India's 0 is below the median for lower middle income countries, which is 143.52 million. (46 countries reporting)
- India's 0 is below the median for South Asia, which is 205.69 million. (6 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1940s | 22.64 million | 0 | 72.44 million | 5 |
| 1950s | 79.68 million | 0 | 177.06 million | 10 |
| 1960s | 253.80 million | 62.67 million | 456.27 million | 10 |
| 1970s | 173.67 million | 0 | 698.32 million | 10 |
| 1980s | 2.82 billion | 791.46 million | 4.53 billion | 10 |
| 1990s | 1.68 billion | 38.50 million | 3.58 billion | 10 |
| 2000s | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 |
| 2010s | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 |
| 2020s | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 |
Countries ranked near India
- 84 Dominica 9.25 million compare
- 85 Solomon Islands 6.27 million compare
- 86 Yemen, People's Democratic Republic of 990,000 compare
- 87 Andorra 0
- 87 United Arab Emirates 0
- 87 Antigua and Barbuda 0 compare
- 87 Australia 0 compare
- 87 Austria 0
- 87 Azerbaijan 0 compare
- 87 Belgium 0
- 87 Bulgaria 0 compare
- 87 Bahrain 0
- 87 Bahamas 0 compare
- 87 Belarus 0 compare
- 87 Belize 0 compare
- 87 Bolivia 0 compare
- 87 Brazil 0 compare
- 87 Brunei 0
- 87 Bhutan 0
- 87 Botswana 0
- 87 Canada 0 compare
- 87 Switzerland 0
- 87 Chile 0 compare
- 87 China 0 compare
- 87 Colombia 0 compare
- 87 Czechoslovakia 0 compare
- 87 Cuba 0 compare
- 87 Cyprus 0 compare
- 87 Czechia 0 compare
- 87 Germany 0
- 87 Denmark 0 compare
- 87 Dominican Republic 0 compare
- 87 Algeria 0 compare
- 87 Eritrea 0
- 87 Spain 0 compare
- 87 Estonia 0 compare
- 87 Finland 0 compare
- 87 Fiji 0 compare
- 87 France 0 compare
- 87 Micronesia (country) 0
- 87 United Kingdom 0 compare
- 87 Greece 0 compare
- 87 Guatemala 0 compare
- 87 Guyana 0 compare
- 87 Croatia 0 compare
- 87 Hungary 0 compare
- 87 Indonesia 0 compare
- 87 Ireland 0 compare
- 87 Iran 0 compare
- 87 Iraq 0 compare
- 87 Iceland 0 compare
- 87 Israel 0 compare
- 87 Italy 0 compare
- 87 Japan 0 compare
- 87 Kazakhstan 0 compare
- 87 Cambodia 0 compare
- 87 Kiribati 0
- 87 Saint Kitts and Nevis 0 compare
- 87 South Korea 0 compare
- 87 Kuwait 0
- 87 Laos 0 compare
- 87 Lebanon 0 compare
- 87 Libya 0
- 87 Lithuania 0 compare
- 87 Luxembourg 0
- 87 Latvia 0 compare
- 87 Mexico 0 compare
- 87 Marshall Islands 0
- 87 Malta 0
- 87 Montenegro 0 compare
- 87 Mauritius 0 compare
- 87 Malaysia 0 compare
- 87 Nigeria 0 compare
- 87 Netherlands 0 compare
- 87 Norway 0
- 87 Nauru 0
- 87 New Zealand 0 compare
- 87 Oman 0
- 87 Panama 0 compare
- 87 Peru 0 compare
- 87 Philippines 0 compare
- 87 Palau 0
- 87 Poland 0 compare
- 87 Portugal 0 compare
- 87 Qatar 0
- 87 Romania 0 compare
- 87 Russia 0 compare
- 87 Saudi Arabia 0
- 87 Singapore 0
- 87 San Marino 0
- 87 Slovakia 0 compare
- 87 Slovenia 0 compare
- 87 Sweden 0
- 87 Eswatini 0 compare
- 87 Syria 0 compare
- 87 Thailand 0 compare
- 87 Turkmenistan 0
- 87 East Timor 0
- 87 Trinidad and Tobago 0 compare
- 87 Turkey 0 compare
- 87 Tuvalu 0
- 87 Uruguay 0 compare
- 87 United States 0
- 87 Venezuela 0 compare
- 87 Vietnam 0 compare
- 87 Vanuatu 0 compare
- 87 Yemen 0 compare
- 87 Yugoslavia, Socialist Federal Republic of 0 compare
- 87 South Africa 0 compare
- 87 Zimbabwe 0 compare
More financial sector data for India
- Reserve position in the IMF, US dollar, annual growth rate 13.2 % change on previous year (2025)
- Reserve position in the IMF, US dollar, per unit of GDP 0.0012 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Reserve position in the IMF, US dollar, per capita 3.26 units per person (2025)
- Reserve position in the IMF, SDR, annual growth rate 7.8 % change on previous year (2025)
- Reserve position in the IMF, SDR, per unit of GDP 0.0009 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Reserve position in the IMF, SDR, per capita 2.38 units per person (2025)
- Reserve tranche position, US dollar, annual growth rate 13.2 % change on previous year (2025)
- Reserve tranche position, US dollar, per unit of GDP 0.0012 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Reserve tranche position, US dollar, per capita 3.26 units per person (2025)
- Reserve tranche position, SDR, annual growth rate 7.8 % change on previous year (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is use of imf credit and loans, sdr in India?
- Use of imf credit and loans, sdr in India was 0 in 2025, according to International Monetary Fund.
- What is the highest use of imf credit and loans, sdr recorded in India?
- The highest recorded value was 4.53 billion in 1984.
- What is the lowest use of imf credit and loans, sdr recorded in India?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 in 1945.
- How does India rank for use of imf credit and loans, sdr?
- India ranks 87th out of 194 countries with data for 2025.
- Where does this India data come from?
- The figures come from International Monetary Fund, published as part of Use of IMF Credit and Loans, SDR. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 81 observations, free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required).
About this data
The Fund Accounts dataset provides information on IMF member countries' transactions with, and accounts with the Fund.