Use of IMF Credit and Loans, US dollar in Chile
Chile: Use of IMF Credit and Loans, US dollar was 0 in 2025. ◆ Volatile
Use of IMF Credit and Loans, US dollar in Chile, 1945–2025
Source: International Monetary Fund.
Analysis
Chile recorded 0 for use of imf credit and loans, us dollar in 2025. That is the lowest value across all 81 years on record.
Over the whole period, use of imf credit and loans, us dollar in Chile peaked at 1.46 billion in 1987 and was at its lowest, 0, in 1945.
Chile ranks 87th of 194 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Use of IMF Credit and Loans, US dollar in Chile, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1945 | 0 | — |
| 1946 | 0 | — |
| 1947 | 0 | — |
| 1948 | 0 | — |
| 1949 | 0 | — |
| 1950 | 0 | — |
| 1951 | 0 | — |
| 1952 | 0 | — |
| 1953 | 0 | — |
| 1954 | 0 | — |
| 1955 | 0 | — |
| 1956 | 0 | — |
| 1957 | 18.58 million | — |
| 1958 | 29.23 million | +57.3% |
| 1959 | 22.98 million | -21.4% |
| 1960 | 4.34 million | -81.1% |
| 1961 | 63.69 million | +1367.5% |
| 1962 | 50.99 million | -19.9% |
| 1963 | 90.99 million | +78.4% |
| 1964 | 100.99 million | +11.0% |
| 1965 | 99.99 million | -1.0% |
| 1966 | 85.19 million | -14.8% |
| 1967 | 69.99 million | -17.8% |
| 1968 | 78.99 million | +12.9% |
| 1969 | 56.99 million | -27.9% |
| 1970 | 1.49 million | -97.4% |
| 1971 | 42.89 million | +2778.2% |
| 1972 | 85.77 million | +100.0% |
| 1973 | 95.30 million | +11.1% |
| 1974 | 195.86 million | +105.5% |
| 1975 | 387.24 million | +97.7% |
| 1976 | 467.31 million | +20.7% |
| 1977 | 365.17 million | -21.9% |
| 1978 | 347.18 million | -4.9% |
| 1979 | 179.08 million | -48.4% |
| 1980 | 122.83 million | -31.4% |
| 1981 | 48.65 million | -60.4% |
| 1982 | 6.27 million | -87.1% |
| 1983 | 606.19 million | +9574.8% |
| 1984 | 779.27 million | +28.6% |
| 1985 | 1.09 billion | +39.6% |
| 1986 | 1.33 billion | +22.3% |
| 1987 | 1.46 billion | +10.0% |
| 1988 | 1.32 billion | -9.7% |
| 1989 | 1.27 billion | -3.9% |
| 1990 | 1.16 billion | -8.9% |
| 1991 | 957.50 million | -17.2% |
| 1992 | 721.90 million | -24.6% |
| 1993 | 475.94 million | -34.1% |
| 1994 | 291.21 million | -38.8% |
| 1995 | 0 | -100.0% |
| 1996 | 0 | — |
| 1997 | 0 | — |
| 1998 | 0 | — |
| 1999 | 0 | — |
| 2000 | 0 | — |
| 2001 | 0 | — |
| 2002 | 0 | — |
| 2003 | 0 | — |
| 2004 | 0 | — |
| 2005 | 0 | — |
| 2006 | 0 | — |
| 2007 | 0 | — |
| 2008 | 0 | — |
| 2009 | 0 | — |
| 2010 | 0 | — |
| 2011 | 0 | — |
| 2012 | 0 | — |
| 2013 | 0 | — |
| 2014 | 0 | — |
| 2015 | 0 | — |
| 2016 | 0 | — |
| 2017 | 0 | — |
| 2018 | 0 | — |
| 2019 | 0 | — |
| 2020 | 0 | — |
| 2021 | 0 | — |
| 2022 | 0 | — |
| 2023 | 0 | — |
| 2024 | 0 | — |
| 2025 | 0 | — |
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Use of IMF Credit and Loans, US dollar in Chile changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1983 | +9574.8% | 6.27 million | 606.19 million |
| 1971 | +2778.2% | 1.49 million | 42.89 million |
| 1961 | +1367.5% | 4.34 million | 63.69 million |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1940s | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 |
| 1950s | 7.08 million | 0 | 29.23 million | 10 |
| 1960s | 70.22 million | 4.34 million | 100.99 million | 10 |
| 1970s | 216.73 million | 1.49 million | 467.31 million | 10 |
| 1980s | 803.94 million | 6.27 million | 1.46 billion | 10 |
| 1990s | 360.30 million | 0 | 1.16 billion | 10 |
| 2000s | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 |
| 2010s | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 |
| 2020s | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 |
Countries ranked near Chile
- 84 Dominica 12.67 million compare
- 85 Solomon Islands 8.58 million compare
- 86 Yemen, People's Democratic Republic of 1.30 million compare
- 87 Andorra 0
- 87 United Arab Emirates 0
- 87 Antigua and Barbuda 0 compare
- 87 Australia 0 compare
- 87 Austria 0
- 87 Azerbaijan 0 compare
- 87 Belgium 0
- 87 Bulgaria 0 compare
- 87 Bahrain 0
- 87 Bahamas 0 compare
- 87 Belarus 0 compare
- 87 Belize 0 compare
- 87 Bolivia 0 compare
- 87 Brazil 0 compare
- 87 Brunei 0
- 87 Bhutan 0
- 87 Botswana 0
- 87 Canada 0 compare
- 87 Switzerland 0
- 87 China 0 compare
- 87 Colombia 0 compare
- 87 Czechoslovakia 0 compare
- 87 Cuba 0 compare
- 87 Cyprus 0 compare
- 87 Czechia 0 compare
- 87 Germany 0
- 87 Denmark 0 compare
- 87 Dominican Republic 0 compare
- 87 Algeria 0 compare
- 87 Eritrea 0
- 87 Spain 0 compare
- 87 Estonia 0 compare
- 87 Finland 0 compare
- 87 Fiji 0 compare
- 87 France 0 compare
- 87 Micronesia (country) 0
- 87 United Kingdom 0 compare
- 87 Greece 0 compare
- 87 Guatemala 0 compare
- 87 Guyana 0 compare
- 87 Croatia 0 compare
- 87 Hungary 0 compare
- 87 Indonesia 0 compare
- 87 India 0 compare
- 87 Ireland 0 compare
- 87 Iran 0 compare
- 87 Iraq 0 compare
- 87 Iceland 0 compare
- 87 Israel 0 compare
- 87 Italy 0 compare
- 87 Japan 0 compare
- 87 Kazakhstan 0 compare
- 87 Cambodia 0 compare
- 87 Kiribati 0
- 87 Saint Kitts and Nevis 0 compare
- 87 South Korea 0 compare
- 87 Kuwait 0
- 87 Laos 0 compare
- 87 Lebanon 0 compare
- 87 Libya 0
- 87 Lithuania 0 compare
- 87 Luxembourg 0
- 87 Latvia 0 compare
- 87 Mexico 0 compare
- 87 Marshall Islands 0
- 87 Malta 0
- 87 Montenegro 0 compare
- 87 Mauritius 0 compare
- 87 Malaysia 0 compare
- 87 Nigeria 0 compare
- 87 Netherlands 0 compare
- 87 Norway 0
- 87 Nauru 0
- 87 New Zealand 0 compare
- 87 Oman 0
- 87 Panama 0 compare
- 87 Peru 0 compare
- 87 Philippines 0 compare
- 87 Palau 0
- 87 Poland 0 compare
- 87 Portugal 0 compare
- 87 Qatar 0
- 87 Romania 0 compare
- 87 Russia 0 compare
- 87 Saudi Arabia 0
- 87 Singapore 0
- 87 San Marino 0
- 87 Slovakia 0 compare
- 87 Slovenia 0 compare
- 87 Sweden 0
- 87 Eswatini 0 compare
- 87 Syria 0 compare
- 87 Thailand 0 compare
- 87 Turkmenistan 0
- 87 East Timor 0
- 87 Trinidad and Tobago 0 compare
- 87 Turkey 0 compare
- 87 Tuvalu 0
- 87 Uruguay 0 compare
- 87 United States 0
- 87 Venezuela 0 compare
- 87 Vietnam 0 compare
- 87 Vanuatu 0 compare
- 87 Yemen 0 compare
- 87 Yugoslavia, Socialist Federal Republic of 0 compare
- 87 South Africa 0 compare
- 87 Zimbabwe 0 compare
More financial sector data for Chile
- Reserve position in the IMF, US dollar, annual growth rate 7.62 % change on previous year (2025)
- Reserve position in the IMF, US dollar, per unit of GDP 0.0018 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Reserve position in the IMF, US dollar, per capita 31.58 units per person (2025)
- Reserve position in the IMF, SDR, annual growth rate 2.48 % change on previous year (2025)
- Reserve position in the IMF, SDR, per unit of GDP 0.0013 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Reserve position in the IMF, SDR, per capita 23.06 units per person (2025)
- Reserve tranche position, US dollar, annual growth rate 7.62 % change on previous year (2025)
- Reserve tranche position, US dollar, per unit of GDP 0.0018 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Reserve tranche position, US dollar, per capita 31.58 units per person (2025)
- Reserve tranche position, SDR, annual growth rate 2.48 % change on previous year (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is use of imf credit and loans, us dollar in Chile?
- Use of imf credit and loans, us dollar in Chile was 0 in 2025, according to International Monetary Fund.
- What is the highest use of imf credit and loans, us dollar recorded in Chile?
- The highest recorded value was 1.46 billion in 1987.
- What is the lowest use of imf credit and loans, us dollar recorded in Chile?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 in 1945.
- How does Chile rank for use of imf credit and loans, us dollar?
- Chile ranks 87th out of 194 countries with data for 2025.
- Where does this Chile data come from?
- The figures come from International Monetary Fund, published as part of Use of IMF Credit and Loans, US dollar. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 81 observations, free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required).
About this data
The Fund Accounts dataset provides information on IMF member countries' transactions with, and accounts with the Fund.