Armenia vs Uzbekistan: Bank capital to assets ratio
Bank capital to assets ratio over time
- Armenia
- Uzbekistan
How they compare
Armenia currently reports 14.1% against 13.3% in Uzbekistan, a difference of 0.8%.
That makes Armenia's figure about 1.1 times Uzbekistan's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Armenia ahead.
Armenia ranks 11th and Uzbekistan ranks 14th of 147 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Armenia averaged higher in 1 and Uzbekistan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Armenia | Uzbekistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 13.2% | 10.8% | 2.4% | Armenia |
| 2020s | 13.0% | 13.0% | 0.0% | Uzbekistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher bank capital to assets ratio, Armenia or Uzbekistan?
- Armenia, at 14.1% against 13.3% in Uzbekistan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in bank capital to assets ratio between Armenia and Uzbekistan?
- 0.8%, with Armenia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Uzbekistan?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2024.
- How do Armenia and Uzbekistan rank globally for bank capital to assets ratio?
- Armenia ranks 11th and Uzbekistan ranks 14th of 147 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Financial Soundness Indicators, International Monetary Fund (IMF), published as Bank capital to assets ratio (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The indicator is a measure of capital adequacy that evaluates the financial strength of deposit takers by comparing Tier 1 capital to total assets. Tier 1 capital, often referred to as core capital, includes the most stable and readily available forms of capital, such as common equity, disclosed reserves, retained earnings, and certain other instruments that meet regulatory requirements under the Basel framework. This capital is considered the highest quality because it is fully available to cover losses and does not need to be repaid.