Ecuador vs Namibia: Bank capital to assets ratio
Bank capital to assets ratio over time
- Ecuador
- Namibia
How they compare
Namibia currently reports 11.1% against 10.9% in Ecuador, a difference of 0.2%.
Across all 11 years both countries report, Ecuador has been ahead every year.
Ecuador ranks 45th and Namibia ranks 44th of 146 countries.
Ecuador has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Namibia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 10.3% | 8.9% | 1.4% | Ecuador |
| 2020s | 10.9% | 9.6% | 1.2% | Ecuador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher bank capital to assets ratio, Ecuador or Namibia?
- Namibia, at 11.1% against 10.9% in Ecuador as of 2025.
- What is the difference in bank capital to assets ratio between Ecuador and Namibia?
- 0.2%, with Namibia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Namibia?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2020.
- How do Ecuador and Namibia rank globally for bank capital to assets ratio?
- Ecuador ranks 45th and Namibia ranks 44th of 146 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Financial Soundness Indicators, International Monetary Fund (IMF), published as Bank capital to assets ratio (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The indicator is a measure of capital adequacy that evaluates the financial strength of deposit takers by comparing Tier 1 capital to total assets. Tier 1 capital, often referred to as core capital, includes the most stable and readily available forms of capital, such as common equity, disclosed reserves, retained earnings, and certain other instruments that meet regulatory requirements under the Basel framework. This capital is considered the highest quality because it is fully available to cover losses and does not need to be repaid.