Georgia vs Solomon Islands: Bank capital to assets ratio
Bank capital to assets ratio over time
- Georgia
- Solomon Islands
How they compare
Georgia currently reports 15.2% against 14.5% in Solomon Islands, a difference of 0.7%.
That makes Georgia's figure about 1.1 times Solomon Islands's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Solomon Islands ahead.
Georgia ranks 5th and Solomon Islands ranks 8th of 147 countries.
Solomon Islands has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Georgia | Solomon Islands | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 11.9% | 12.6% | 0.7% | Solomon Islands |
| 2020s | 13.4% | 13.7% | 0.3% | Solomon Islands |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher bank capital to assets ratio, Georgia or Solomon Islands?
- Georgia, at 15.2% against 14.5% in Solomon Islands as of 2025.
- What is the difference in bank capital to assets ratio between Georgia and Solomon Islands?
- 0.7%, with Georgia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and Solomon Islands?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2024.
- How do Georgia and Solomon Islands rank globally for bank capital to assets ratio?
- Georgia ranks 5th and Solomon Islands ranks 8th of 147 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Financial Soundness Indicators, International Monetary Fund (IMF), published as Bank capital to assets ratio (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The indicator is a measure of capital adequacy that evaluates the financial strength of deposit takers by comparing Tier 1 capital to total assets. Tier 1 capital, often referred to as core capital, includes the most stable and readily available forms of capital, such as common equity, disclosed reserves, retained earnings, and certain other instruments that meet regulatory requirements under the Basel framework. This capital is considered the highest quality because it is fully available to cover losses and does not need to be repaid.