Hong Kong, China vs Malta: Bank capital to assets ratio
Bank capital to assets ratio over time
- Hong Kong, China
- Malta
How they compare
Malta currently reports 8.0% against 7.9% in Hong Kong, China, a difference of 0.1%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 15 shared years of data; in 2011 it was Hong Kong, China ahead.
Hong Kong, China ranks 97th and Malta ranks 96th of 147 countries.
Hong Kong, China has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Hong Kong, China | Malta | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 9.2% | 6.6% | 2.6% | Hong Kong, China |
| 2020s | 8.3% | 7.8% | 0.5% | Hong Kong, China |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher bank capital to assets ratio, Hong Kong, China or Malta?
- Malta, at 8.0% against 7.9% in Hong Kong, China as of 2025.
- What is the difference in bank capital to assets ratio between Hong Kong, China and Malta?
- 0.1%, with Malta ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong, China and Malta?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2025.
- How do Hong Kong, China and Malta rank globally for bank capital to assets ratio?
- Hong Kong, China ranks 97th and Malta ranks 96th of 147 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Financial Soundness Indicators, International Monetary Fund (IMF), published as Bank capital to assets ratio (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The indicator is a measure of capital adequacy that evaluates the financial strength of deposit takers by comparing Tier 1 capital to total assets. Tier 1 capital, often referred to as core capital, includes the most stable and readily available forms of capital, such as common equity, disclosed reserves, retained earnings, and certain other instruments that meet regulatory requirements under the Basel framework. This capital is considered the highest quality because it is fully available to cover losses and does not need to be repaid.