Latvia vs Mauritius: Bank capital to assets ratio
Bank capital to assets ratio over time
- Latvia
- Mauritius
How they compare
Mauritius currently reports 9.1% against 8.9% in Latvia, a difference of 0.2%.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2011 it was Latvia ahead.
Latvia ranks 78th and Mauritius ranks 75th of 147 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Latvia averaged higher in 1 and Mauritius in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Mauritius | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 9.0% | 8.3% | 0.7% | Latvia |
| 2020s | 9.2% | 9.3% | 0.1% | Mauritius |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher bank capital to assets ratio, Latvia or Mauritius?
- Mauritius, at 9.1% against 8.9% in Latvia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in bank capital to assets ratio between Latvia and Mauritius?
- 0.2%, with Mauritius ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Mauritius?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2025.
- How do Latvia and Mauritius rank globally for bank capital to assets ratio?
- Latvia ranks 78th and Mauritius ranks 75th of 147 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Financial Soundness Indicators, International Monetary Fund (IMF), published as Bank capital to assets ratio (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The indicator is a measure of capital adequacy that evaluates the financial strength of deposit takers by comparing Tier 1 capital to total assets. Tier 1 capital, often referred to as core capital, includes the most stable and readily available forms of capital, such as common equity, disclosed reserves, retained earnings, and certain other instruments that meet regulatory requirements under the Basel framework. This capital is considered the highest quality because it is fully available to cover losses and does not need to be repaid.