North Macedonia vs Papua New Guinea: Bank capital to assets ratio
Bank capital to assets ratio over time
- North Macedonia
- Papua New Guinea
How they compare
Papua New Guinea currently reports 12.3% against 12.3% in North Macedonia, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 16 shared years of data; in 2008 it was North Macedonia ahead.
North Macedonia ranks 26th and Papua New Guinea ranks 25th of 147 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, North Macedonia averaged higher in 1 and Papua New Guinea in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | North Macedonia | Papua New Guinea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 11.4% | 10.6% | 0.8% | North Macedonia |
| 2010s | 10.3% | 12.5% | 2.2% | Papua New Guinea |
| 2020s | 10.9% | 12.4% | 1.4% | Papua New Guinea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher bank capital to assets ratio, North Macedonia or Papua New Guinea?
- Papua New Guinea, at 12.3% against 12.3% in North Macedonia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in bank capital to assets ratio between North Macedonia and Papua New Guinea?
- 0.0%, with Papua New Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for North Macedonia and Papua New Guinea?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2023.
- How do North Macedonia and Papua New Guinea rank globally for bank capital to assets ratio?
- North Macedonia ranks 26th and Papua New Guinea ranks 25th of 147 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Financial Soundness Indicators, International Monetary Fund (IMF), published as Bank capital to assets ratio (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The indicator is a measure of capital adequacy that evaluates the financial strength of deposit takers by comparing Tier 1 capital to total assets. Tier 1 capital, often referred to as core capital, includes the most stable and readily available forms of capital, such as common equity, disclosed reserves, retained earnings, and certain other instruments that meet regulatory requirements under the Basel framework. This capital is considered the highest quality because it is fully available to cover losses and does not need to be repaid.