Saudi Arabia vs Uzbekistan: Bank capital to assets ratio
Bank capital to assets ratio over time
- Saudi Arabia
- Uzbekistan
How they compare
Saudi Arabia currently reports 13.9% against 13.3% in Uzbekistan, a difference of 0.6%.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Uzbekistan ahead.
Saudi Arabia ranks 13th and Uzbekistan ranks 14th of 147 countries.
Saudi Arabia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Saudi Arabia | Uzbekistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 13.8% | 10.8% | 3.0% | Saudi Arabia |
| 2020s | 13.9% | 13.0% | 1.0% | Saudi Arabia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher bank capital to assets ratio, Saudi Arabia or Uzbekistan?
- Saudi Arabia, at 13.9% against 13.3% in Uzbekistan as of 2025.
- What is the difference in bank capital to assets ratio between Saudi Arabia and Uzbekistan?
- 0.6%, with Saudi Arabia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Saudi Arabia and Uzbekistan?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2024.
- How do Saudi Arabia and Uzbekistan rank globally for bank capital to assets ratio?
- Saudi Arabia ranks 13th and Uzbekistan ranks 14th of 147 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Financial Soundness Indicators, International Monetary Fund (IMF), published as Bank capital to assets ratio (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The indicator is a measure of capital adequacy that evaluates the financial strength of deposit takers by comparing Tier 1 capital to total assets. Tier 1 capital, often referred to as core capital, includes the most stable and readily available forms of capital, such as common equity, disclosed reserves, retained earnings, and certain other instruments that meet regulatory requirements under the Basel framework. This capital is considered the highest quality because it is fully available to cover losses and does not need to be repaid.